Constructive Set Theory - Myhill's Constructive Set Theory

Myhill's Constructive Set Theory

The subject was begun by John Myhill to provide a formal foundation for Errett Bishop's program of constructive mathematics. As he presented it, Myhill's system CST is a constructive first-order logic with three sorts: natural numbers, functions, and sets. The system is:

  • Constructive first-order predicate logic with identity, and basic axioms related to the three sorts.
  • The usual Peano axioms for natural numbers.
  • The usual axiom of extensionality for sets, as well as one for functions, and the usual axiom of union.
  • A form of the axiom of infinity asserting that the collection of natural numbers (for which he introduces a constant N) is in fact a set.
  • Axioms asserting that the domain and range of a function are both sets. Additionally, an axiom of non-choice asserts the existence of a choice function in cases where the choice is already made. Together these act like the usual replacement axiom in classical set theory.
  • The axiom of exponentiation, asserting that for any two sets, there is a third set which contains all (and only) the functions whose domain is the first set, and whose range is the second set. This is a greatly weakened form of the axiom of power set in classical set theory, to which Myhill, among others, objected on the grounds of its impredicativity.
  • The axiom of restricted, or predicative, separation, which is a weakened form of the separation axiom in classical set theory, requiring that any quantifications be bounded to another set.
  • An axiom of dependent choice, which is much weaker than the usual axiom of choice.

Read more about this topic:  Constructive Set Theory

Famous quotes containing the words constructive, set and/or theory:

    Work is a responsibility most adults assume, a burden at times, a complication, but also a challenge that, like children, requires enormous energy and that holds the potential for qualitative, as well as quantitative, rewards. Isn’t this the only constructive perspective for women who have no choice but to work? And isn’t it a more healthy attitude for women writhing with guilt because they choose to compound the challenges of motherhood with work they enjoy?
    Melinda M. Marshall (20th century)

    Ceremony was but devised at first
    To set a gloss on faint deeds, hollow welcomes,
    Recanting goodness, sorry ere ‘tis shown;
    But where there is true friendship, there needs none.
    William Shakespeare (1564–1616)

    Could Shakespeare give a theory of Shakespeare?
    Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)