Existential Quantification - Properties - Rules of Inference

Transformation rules
Propositional calculus

Rules of inference
Modus ponens
Modus tollens
Biconditional introduction
Biconditional elimination
Conjunction introduction
Simplification
Disjunction introduction
Disjunction elimination
Disjunctive syllogism
Hypothetical syllogism
Constructive dilemma
Destructive dilemma
Absorption

Rules of replacement

Associativity
Commutativity
Distributivity
Double negation
De Morgan's laws
Transposition
Material implication
Exportation
Tautology
Predicate logic
Universal generalization
Universal instantiation
Existential generalization
Existential instantiation

A rule of inference is a rule justifying a logical step from hypothesis to conclusion. There are several rules of inference which utilize the existential quantifier.

Existential introduction (∃I) concludes that, if the propositional function is known to be true for a particular element of the domain of discourse, then it must be true that there exists an element for which the proposition function is true. Symbolically,

The reasoning behind existential elimination (∃E) is as follows: If it is given that there exists an element for which the proposition function is true, and if a conclusion can be reached by giving that element an arbitrary name, that conclusion is necessarily true, as long as it does not contain the name. Symbolically, for an arbitrary c and for a proposition Q in which c does not appear:

must be true for all values of c over the same domain X; else, the logic does not follow: If c is not arbitrary, and is instead a specific element of the domain of discourse, then stating P(c) might unjustifiably give more information about that object.

Read more about this topic:  Existential Quantification, Properties

Famous quotes containing the words rules of, rules and/or inference:

    Those rules of old discovered, not devised,
    Are Nature sill, but Nature methodized;
    Nature, like liberty, is but restrained
    By the same laws which first herself ordained.
    Alexander Pope (1688–1744)

    There are different rules for reading, for thinking, and for talking. Writing blends all three of them.
    Mason Cooley (b. 1927)

    I shouldn’t want you to be surprised, or to draw any particular inference from my making speeches, or not making speeches, out there. I don’t recall any candidate for President that ever injured himself very much by not talking.
    Calvin Coolidge (1872–1933)