Structure
Whereas the Whyte notation counts wheels, the UIC notation counts axles.
- Upper-case letters
- the number of consecutive driving axles, starting at A for a single axle. C thus indicates three consecutive pairs of driving wheels.
- Numbers
- consecutive non-driving axles, starting with 1 for a single axle.
- Lower-case "o", suffixing the driving wheel letter
- axles are individually driven by electric traction motors.
- Prime sign " ′ "
- the axles are mounted on a bogie.
- Plus sign "+"
- the locomotive or multiple unit consists of permanently coupled and mechanically separated individual vehicles.
- Brackets
- groups letters and numbers describing the same bogie. For example, (A1A) indicates a three-axle bogie with the outer two axles driven. When brackets are used a prime is not needed to indicate a bogie. Mallet locomotives can be indicated by bracketing the front power unit — for example, the Union Pacific Big Boy, 4-8-8-4 in Whyte notation, is (2′D)D2′ in UIC notation.
Garratt-type locomotives are indicated by bracketing or placing plus signs between all individual units.
- Other suffixes
-
- h: Superheated Steam (German: Heißdampf)
- n: Saturated Steam (German: Nassdampf)
- v: Compound (German: Verbund)
- Turb: Turbine
- number: number of cylinders
- t: Tank locomotive
- G: Freight (German: Güterzug – freight train). Also used to indicate shunting locomotives
- P: Passenger (German: Personenzug – passenger train)
- S: Fast passenger (German: Schnellzug – express train)
The most common wheel arrangements in modern locomotives are Bo′Bo′ and Co′Co′.
Read more about this topic: UIC Classification Of Locomotive Axle Arrangements
Famous quotes containing the word structure:
“One theme links together these new proposals for family policy—the idea that the family is exceedingly durable. Changes in structure and function and individual roles are not to be confused with the collapse of the family. Families remain more important in the lives of children than other institutions. Family ties are stronger and more vital than many of us imagine in the perennial atmosphere of crisis surrounding the subject.”
—Joseph Featherstone (20th century)
“The question is still asked of women: “How do you propose to answer the need for child care?” That is an obvious attempt to structure conflict in the old terms. The questions are rather: “If we as a human community want children, how does the total society propose to provide for them?””
—Jean Baker Miller (20th century)
“Why does philosophy use concepts and why does faith use symbols if both try to express the same ultimate? The answer, of course, is that the relation to the ultimate is not the same in each case. The philosophical relation is in principle a detached description of the basic structure in which the ultimate manifests itself. The relation of faith is in principle an involved expression of concern about the meaning of the ultimate for the faithful.”
—Paul Tillich (1886–1965)