Recursive Bayesian Estimation - Model

Model

The true state is assumed to be an unobserved Markov process, and the measurements are the observed states of a Hidden Markov Model (HMM). The following picture presents a Bayesian Network of a HMM.

Because of the Markov assumption, the probability of the current true state given the immediately previous one is conditionally independent of the other earlier states.

Similarly, the measurement at the k-th timestep is dependent only upon the current state, so is conditionally independent of all other states given the current state.

Using these assumptions the probability distribution over all states of the HMM can be written simply as:

However, when using the Kalman filter to estimate the state x, the probability distribution of interest is associated with the current states conditioned on the measurements up to the current timestep. (This is achieved by marginalising out the previous states and dividing by the probability of the measurement set.)

This leads to the predict and update steps of the Kalman filter written probabilistically. The probability distribution associated with the predicted state is the sum (integral) of the products of the probability distribution associated with the transition from the (k - 1)-th timestep to the k-th and the probability distribution associated with the previous state, over all possible .

The probability distribution of update is proportional to the product of the measurement likelihood and the predicted state.

 p(\textbf{x}_k|\textbf{z}_{k}) = \frac{p(\textbf{z}_k|\textbf{x}_k) p(\textbf{x}_k|\textbf{z}_{k-1})}{p(\textbf{z}_k|\textbf{z}_{k-1})}
= \alpha\,p(\textbf{z}_k|\textbf{x}_k) p(\textbf{x}_k|\textbf{z}_{k-1})

The denominator

is constant relative to, so we can always substitute it for a coefficient, which can usually be ignored in practice. The numerator can be calculated and then simply normalized, since its integral must be unitary.

Read more about this topic:  Recursive Bayesian Estimation

Famous quotes containing the word model:

    The striking point about our model family is not simply the compete-compete, consume-consume style of life it urges us to follow.... The striking point, in the face of all the propaganda, is how few Americans actually live this way.
    Louise Kapp Howe (b. 1934)

    Socrates, who was a perfect model in all great qualities, ... hit on a body and face so ugly and so incongruous with the beauty of his soul, he who was so madly in love with beauty.
    Michel de Montaigne (1533–1592)

    ...that absolutely everything beloved and cherished of the bourgeoisie, the conservative, the cowardly, and the impotent—the State, family life, secular art and science—was consciously or unconsciously hostile to the religious idea, to the Church, whose innate tendency and permanent aim was the dissolution of all existing worldly orders, and the reconstitution of society after the model of the ideal, the communistic City of God.
    Thomas Mann (1875–1955)