Strict and Non-strict Partial Orders
In some contexts, the partial order defined above is called a non-strict (or reflexive, or weak) partial order. In these contexts a strict (or irreflexive) partial order "<" is a binary relation that is irreflexive and transitive, and therefore asymmetric. In other words, asymmetric (hence irreflexive) and transitive.
Thus, for all a, b, and c in P, we have that:
- ¬(a < a) (irreflexivity);
- if a < b then ¬(b < a) (asymmetry); and
- if a < b and b < c then a < c (transitivity).
There is a 1-to-1 correspondence between all non-strict and strict partial orders.
If "≤" is a non-strict partial order, then the corresponding strict partial order "<" is the reflexive reduction given by:
- a < b if and only if (a ≤ b and a ≠ b)
Conversely, if "<" is a strict partial order, then the corresponding non-strict partial order "≤" is the reflexive closure given by:
- a ≤ b if and only if a < b or a = b.
This is the reason for using the notation "≤".
Strict partial orders are useful because they correspond more directly to directed acyclic graphs (dags): every strict partial order is a dag, and the transitive closure of a dag is both a strict partial order and also a dag itself.
Read more about this topic: Partially Ordered Set
Famous quotes containing the words strict, partial and/or orders:
“Yet if strict criticism should till frown on our method, let candor and good humor forgive what is done to the best of our judgment, for the sake of perspicuity in the story and the delight and entertainment of our candid reader.”
—Sarah Fielding (1710–1768)
“Both the man of science and the man of art live always at the edge of mystery, surrounded by it. Both, as a measure of their creation, have always had to do with the harmonization of what is new with what is familiar, with the balance between novelty and synthesis, with the struggle to make partial order in total chaos.... This cannot be an easy life.”
—J. Robert Oppenheimer (1904–1967)
“Our own physical body possesses a wisdom which we who inhabit the body lack. We give it orders which make no sense.”
—Henry Miller (1891–1980)