Ohio Supreme Court Elections - Candidates For Ohio Supreme Court Judge (1)

Candidates For Ohio Supreme Court Judge (1)

Five-year term beginning February: 1857, 1862, 1867, 1872, 1877, 1882, 1887, 1892, 1897
Elections scheduled: 1856, 1861, 1866, 1871, 1876, 1881, 1886, 1891, 1896 (s = Special election held to fill the seat of a justice who did not complete a term.) BOLD TYPE indicates winning candidate

Year Democrat Republican Other
1856 Rufus P. Ranney : 156,438 Josiah Scott : 175,8181 Daniel Peck (Amer) : 23,868
1861 Thomas J. S. Smith : 151,987 Josiah Scott : 207,443
1866 Thomas M. Key : 213,612 Josiah Scott : 256,263
1871 George W. Geddes : 217,374 William H. West : 237,472
1873 s Charles H. Scribner : 213,551 Walter F. Stone : 214,363
1874 s George Rex : 238,307 William Wartenbee Johnson : 221,182
1876 William E. Finck : 309,933 Washington W. Boynton : 318,772
1881 Edward F. Bingham : 286,650 Nicholas Longworth II : 316,005
1886 Martin Dewey Follett : 326,227 Marshall Jay Williams : 343,739
1891 Gustavus H. Wald : 345,374 Marshall Jay Williams : 373,433
1896 Everett D. Stark : 473,094 Marshall Jay Williams : 525,084
1902 Michael Donnelly William B. Crew

Read more about this topic:  Ohio Supreme Court Elections

Famous quotes containing the words candidates, ohio, supreme, court and/or judge:

    The idea that you can merchandise candidates for high office like breakfast cereal—that you can gather votes like box tops—is, I think, the ultimate indignity to the democratic process.
    Adlai Stevenson (1900–1965)

    Heaven is not one of your fertile Ohio bottoms, you may depend on it.
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    Science, unguided by a higher abstract principle, freely hands over its secrets to a vastly developed and commercially inspired technology, and the latter, even less restrained by a supreme culture saving principle, with the means of science creates all the instruments of power demanded from it by the organization of Might.
    Johan Huizinga (1872–1945)

    We should have learnt by now that laws and court decisions can only point the way. They can establish criteria of right and wrong. And they can provide a basis for rooting out the evils of bigotry and racism. But they cannot wipe away centuries of oppression and injustice—however much we might desire it.
    Hubert H. Humphrey (1911–1978)

    To judge from a single conversation, he made the impression of a narrow and very English mind; of one who paid for his rare elevation by general tameness and conformity. Off his own beat, his opinions were of no value.
    Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)