Proficiency and Division Class Labels and Advancement Method
| Class | Proficiency and/or age division | |
|---|---|---|
| Amateur Proficiency levels 20 inch class: | Novice, Expert. 5 & Under, 6 & 7 novice to 16 & Over Expert in one year steps. |
|
| Amateur Cruiser: | 14 & Under to 27 & Over Cruiser in two-year steps. Age classifications only, no proficiency levels. Men only. | |
| Powder Puff (Girls) 20 inch: | 10 & Under, 11-13, 14 & Over. Age classifications only, no proficiency levels. Amateur only. | |
| Professional Classes: | Senior Open, Pro Cruiser, Pro 20". Men only. | |
| Qualifying system: | Moto system aka Olympic System aka Cumulative System. | |
Read more about this topic: National Bicycle Association
Famous quotes containing the words proficiency, division, class, labels, advancement and/or method:
“The best chess-player in Christendom may be little more than the best player of chess; but proficiency in whist implies capacity for success in all these more important undertakings where mind struggles with mind.”
—Edgar Allan Poe (1809–1845)
“Between married persons, the cement of friendship is by the laws supposed so strong as to abolish all division of possessions: and has often, in reality, the force ascribed to it.
”
—David Hume (1711–1776)
“We are the party of all labor.
The whole earth shall be ours to share
And every race and craft our neighbor.
No idle class shall linger there
Like vultures on the wealth we render
From field and factory, mill and mine.
Tomorrow’s sun will rise in splendor
And light us till the end of time.”
—Eugène Pottier (1816–1887)
“The Prime Minister has an absolute genius for putting flamboyant labels on empty luggage.”
—Aneurin Bevan (1897–1960)
“The path of social advancement is, and must be, strewn with broken friendships.”
—H.G. (Herbert George)
““English! they are barbarians; they don’t believe in the great God.” I told him, “Excuse me, Sir. We do believe in God, and in Jesus Christ too.” “Um,” says he, “and in the Pope?” “No.” “And why?” This was a puzzling question in these circumstances.... I thought I would try a method of my own, and very gravely replied, “Because we are too far off.” A very new argument against the universal infallibility of the Pope.”
—James Boswell (1740–1795)