Modular Group - Definition

Definition

The modular group Γ is the group of linear fractional transformations of the upper half of the complex plane which have the form

where a, b, c, and d are integers, and adbc = 1. The group operation is function composition.

This group of transformations is isomorphic to the projective special linear group PSL(2,Z), which is the quotient of the 2-dimensional special linear group SL(2,Z) over the integers by its center {I, −I}. In other words, PSL(2,Z) consists of all matrices

where a, b, c, and d are integers, adbc = 1, and pairs of matrices A and −A are considered to be identical. The group operation is the usual multiplication of matrices.

Some authors define the modular group to be PSL(2,Z), and still others define the modular group to be the larger group SL(2,Z). However, even those who define the modular group to be PSL(2,Z) use the notation of SL(2,Z), with the understanding that matrices are only determined up to sign.

Some mathematical relations require the consideration of the group S*L(2,Z) of matrices with determinant plus or minus one. (SL(2, Z) is a subgroup of this group.) Similarly, PS*L(2,Z) is the quotient group S*L(2,Z)/{I, −I}. A 2x2 matrix with unit determinant is a symplectic matrix, and thus SL(2,Z)=Sp(2,Z), the symplectic group of 2x2 matrices.

One can also use the notation GL(2,Z) for S*L(2,Z), because an integer matrix is invertible if and only if it has determinant equal to ±1. Alternatively, one may use the explicit notation SL±(2,Z).

Read more about this topic:  Modular Group

Famous quotes containing the word definition:

    It’s a rare parent who can see his or her child clearly and objectively. At a school board meeting I attended . . . the only definition of a gifted child on which everyone in the audience could agree was “mine.”
    Jane Adams (20th century)

    The physicians say, they are not materialists; but they are:MSpirit is matter reduced to an extreme thinness: O so thin!—But the definition of spiritual should be, that which is its own evidence. What notions do they attach to love! what to religion! One would not willingly pronounce these words in their hearing, and give them the occasion to profane them.
    Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    The man who knows governments most completely is he who troubles himself least about a definition which shall give their essence. Enjoying an intimate acquaintance with all their particularities in turn, he would naturally regard an abstract conception in which these were unified as a thing more misleading than enlightening.
    William James (1842–1910)