Email Authentication - Criticism

Criticism

This section requires expansion.

Some experts take the position that the ISP is the major drawback to proper elimination of spam. The premise is that the regulating agencies have no authority, and the ISPs have no incentive.

“Authentication cannot stop spam, unless the cop/Reputation Service/Certificate Authority in charge revokes certificates for spamming. If that could happen, then ISPs would also be willing and even enthusiastic about terminating accounts or otherwise controlling (e.g. port block) their spammers. If ISPs would do that, then there would be no spam to need authentication to stop spam and so need for a CA playing cop. As long as ISPs remain unwilling to police their own spamming customers, they would never deal with a CA willing to play cop.
Authentication involving TLS, SMTP-AUTH, or S/MIME cannot stop backscatter for the same reasons SPF, DKIM, and the rest were, are, and always will be powerless against it. Some of those reasons are why Yahoo still does not sign DKIM on all outgoing mail, Hotmail still publishes whishywashy SPF RRs and neither requires their snakeoil forgery solution on incoming mail.”
--Vernon Schryver (Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse operator)

Read more about this topic:  Email Authentication

Famous quotes containing the word criticism:

    “The greater the decrease in the social significance of an art form, the sharper the distinction between criticism and enjoyment by the public. The conventional is uncritically enjoyed, and the truly new is criticized with aversion.”
    —Walter Benjamin (1892–1940)

    “Like speaks to like only; labor to labor, philosophy to philosophy, criticism to criticism, poetry to poetry. Literature speaks how much still to the past, how little to the future, how much to the East, how little to the West.”
    —Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    “...I wasn’t at all prepared for the avalanche of criticism that overwhelmed me. You would have thought I had murdered someone, and perhaps I had, but only to give her successor a chance to live. It was a very sad business indeed to be made to feel that my success depended solely, or at least in large part, on a head of hair.”
    —Mary Pickford (1893–1979)