Formal Definition
Given a function f:X→Y, the set X is the domain of f; the set Y is the codomain of f. In the expression f(x), x is the argument and f(x) is the value. One can think of an argument as an input to the function, and the value as the output.
The image (sometimes called the range) of f is the set of all values assumed by f for all possible x; this is the set . The image of f can be the same set as the codomain or it can be a proper subset of it. It is in general smaller than the codomain; it is the whole codomain if and only if f is a surjective function.
A well-defined function must carry every element of its domain to an element of its codomain. For example, the function f defined by
- f(x) = 1/x
has no value for f(0). Thus, the set of all real numbers, cannot be its domain. In cases like this, the function is either defined on or the "gap is plugged" by explicitly defining f(0). If we extend the definition of f to
- f(x) = 1/x, for x ≠ 0,
- f(0) = 0,
then f is defined for all real numbers, and its domain is .
Any function can be restricted to a subset of its domain. The restriction of g : A → B to S, where S ⊆ A, is written g |S : S → B.
Read more about this topic: Domain Of A Function
Famous quotes containing the words formal and/or definition:
“It is in the nature of allegory, as opposed to symbolism, to beg the question of absolute reality. The allegorist avails himself of a formal correspondence between “ideas” and “things,” both of which he assumes as given; he need not inquire whether either sphere is “real” or whether, in the final analysis, reality consists in their interaction.”
—Charles, Jr. Feidelson, U.S. educator, critic. Symbolism and American Literature, ch. 1, University of Chicago Press (1953)
“Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.”
—Walter Pater (1839–1894)