Congruence Relation - Congruences of Groups, and Normal Subgroups and Ideals

Congruences of Groups, and Normal Subgroups and Ideals

In the particular case of groups, congruence relations can be described in elementary terms as follows: If G is a group (with identity element e and operation *) and ~ is a binary relation on G, then ~ is a congruence whenever:

  1. Given any element a of G, a ~ a (reflexivity);
  2. Given any elements a and b of G, if a ~ b, then b ~ a (symmetry);
  3. Given any elements a, b, and c of G, if a ~ b and b ~ c, then a ~ c (transitivity);
  4. Given any elements a, a', b, and b' of G, if a ~ a' and b ~ b', then a * b ~ a' * b' ;
  5. Given any elements a and a' of G, if a ~ a', then a−1 ~ a' −1 (this can actually be proven from the other four, so is strictly redundant).

Conditions 1, 2, and 3 say that ~ is an equivalence relation.

A congruence ~ is determined entirely by the set {aG : a ~ e} of those elements of G that are congruent to the identity element, and this set is a normal subgroup. Specifically, a ~ b if and only if b−1 * a ~ e. So instead of talking about congruences on groups, people usually speak in terms of normal subgroups of them; in fact, every congruence corresponds uniquely to some normal subgroup of G.

Read more about this topic:  Congruence Relation

Famous quotes containing the words normal and/or ideals:

    Separation anxiety is normal part of development, but individual reactions are partly explained by experience, that is, by how frequently children have been left in the care of others.... A mother who is never apart from her young child may be saying to him or her subliminally: “You are only safe when I’m with you.”
    Cathy Rindner Tempelsman (20th century)

    My own ideals for the university are those of a genuine democracy and serious scholarship. These two, indeed, seem to go together.
    Woodrow Wilson (1856–1924)