Analyticity of Holomorphic Functions - Proof

Proof

The argument, first given by Cauchy, hinges on Cauchy's integral formula and the power series development of the expression

.

Suppose ƒ is differentiable everywhere within some open disk centered at a. Let z be within that open disk. Let C be a positively oriented (i.e., counterclockwise) circle centered at a, lying within that open disk but farther from a than z is. Starting with Cauchy's integral formula, we have

\begin{align}f(z) &{}= {1 \over 2\pi i}\int_C {f(w) \over w-z}\,\mathrm{d}w \\
&{}= {1 \over 2\pi i}\int_C {f(w) \over (w-a)-(z-a)} \,\mathrm{d}w \\
&{}={1 \over 2\pi i}\int_C {1 \over w-a}\cdot{1 \over 1-{z-a \over w-a}}f(w)\,\mathrm{d}w \\
&{}={1 \over 2\pi i}\int_C {1 \over w-a}\cdot{\sum_{n=0}^\infty\left({z-a \over w-a}\right)^n} f(w)\,\mathrm{d}w \\
&{}=\sum_{n=0}^\infty{1 \over 2\pi i}\int_C {(z-a)^n \over (w-a)^{n+1}} f(w)\,\mathrm{d}w.\end{align}

To justify the interchange of the sum and the integral, one must notice that in the intersection of |(za)/(wa)| ≤ r < 1 and some closed domain containing C, ƒ(w)/(wa) is holomorphic and therefore bounded by some positive number M. So we have

The Weierstrass M-test says the series converges uniformly, and thus the interchange of the sum and the integral is justified.

Since the factor (za)n does not depend on the variable of integration w, it can be pulled out:

And now the integral and the factor of 1/(2πi) do not depend on z, i.e., as a function of z, that whole expression is a constant cn, so we can write:

and that is the desired power series.

Read more about this topic:  Analyticity Of Holomorphic Functions

Famous quotes containing the word proof:

    The proof of a poet is that his country absorbs him as affectionately as he has absorbed it.
    Walt Whitman (1819–1892)

    A short letter to a distant friend is, in my opinion, an insult like that of a slight bow or cursory salutation—a proof of unwillingness to do much, even where there is a necessity of doing something.
    Samuel Johnson (1709–1784)

    In the reproof of chance
    Lies the true proof of men.
    William Shakespeare (1564–1616)