2009 NCAA Division I FCS Football Season - Conference Standings

Conference Standings

2009 Big Sky football standings
Conf Overall
Team W L W L
#2 Montana 8 – 0 14 – 1
#13 Eastern Washington 6 – 2 8 – 4
#17 Weber State 6 – 2 7 – 5
Montana State 5 – 3 7 – 4
Northern Arizona 4 – 4 5 – 6
Sacramento State 4 – 4 5 – 6
Northern Colorado 1 – 7 3 – 8
Portland State 1 – 7 2 – 9
Idaho State 1 – 7 1 – 10
† – Conference champion
^ – FCS playoff participant
Rankings from The Sports Network FCS Poll
2009 Big South football standings
Conf Overall
Team W L W L
#22 Liberty 5 – 1 8 – 3
Stony Brook 5 – 1 6 – 5
Charleston Southern 4 – 2 6 – 5
Gardner–Webb 3 – 3 6 – 5
Coastal Carolina 3 – 3 5 – 6
VMI 1 – 5 2 – 9
Presbyterian 0 – 6 0 – 11
§ – Conference co-champions
^ – FCS playoff participant
Rankings from The Sports Network FCS Poll
2009 CAA football standings
Conf Overall
Team W L W L
North
#7 New Hampshire x 6 – 2 10 – 3
Maine 4 – 4 5 – 6
Hofstra 3 – 5 5 – 6
UMass 3 – 5 5 – 6
Northeastern 3 – 5 3 – 8
Rhode Island 0 – 8 1 – 10
South
#1 Villanova x 7 – 1 14 – 1
#5 Richmond x 7 – 1 11 – 2
#4 William & Mary 6 – 2 11 – 3
Delaware 4 – 4 6 – 5
James Madison 4 – 4 6 – 5
Towson 1 – 7 2 – 9
§ – Conference co-champions
x – Division champion/co-champions
^ – FCS playoff participant
Rankings from The Sports Network FCS Poll
2009 Great West football standings
Conf Overall
Team W L W L
UC Davis 3 – 1 6 – 5
North Dakota 2 – 2 6 – 5
South Dakota 2 – 2 5 – 5
Southern Utah 2 – 2 5 – 6
Cal Poly SLO 1 – 3 4 – 7
† – Conference champion
Rankings from The Sports Network FCS Poll
2009 Ivy League football standings
Conf Overall
Team W L W L
#20 Penn 7 – 0 8 – 2
Harvard 6 – 1 7 – 3
Brown 4 – 3 6 – 4
Columbia 3 – 4 4 – 6
Princeton 3 – 4 4 – 6
Yale 2 – 5 4 – 6
Dartmouth 2 – 5 2 – 8
Cornell 1 – 6 2 – 8
† – Conference champion
  • The Ivy League does not participate in the FCS Playoffs
    Rankings from The Sports Network FCS Poll
2009 MEAC football standings
Conf Overall
Team W L W L
#8 South Carolina State 7 – 1 10 – 2
#23 Florida A&M 6 – 2 8 – 3
Norfolk State 5 – 3 7 – 4
Morgan State 4 – 4 6 – 5
Bethune-Cookman 4 – 4 5 – 6
Delaware State 4 – 4 4 – 7
Hampton 3 – 5 5 – 6
North Carolina A&T 2 – 5 4 – 6
Howard 0 – 8 2 – 9
† – Conference champion
^ – FCS playoff participant
Rankings from The Sports Network FCS Poll
2009 MVFC football standings
Conf Overall
Team W L W L
#6 Southern Illinois 8 – 0 11 – 2
#11 South Dakota State 7 – 1 8 – 3
#18 Northern Iowa 5 – 3 7 – 4
Illinois State 5 – 3 6 – 5
Missouri State 4 – 4 6 – 5
Youngstown State 4 – 4 6 – 5
North Dakota State 2 – 6 3 – 8
Indiana State 1 – 7 1 – 10
Western Illinois 0 – 8 1 – 10
† – Conference champion
^ – FCS playoff participant
Rankings from The Sports Network FCS Poll
2009 NEC football standings
Conf Overall
Team W L W L
Central Connecticut State 7 – 1 9 – 3
Albany 6 – 2 7 – 4
Wagner 5 – 3 6 – 5
Robert Morris 5 – 3 5 – 6
Monmouth 4 – 4 5 – 6
Bryant 4 – 4 5 – 6
Duquesne 2 – 6 3 – 8
Sacred Heart 2 – 6 2 – 8
Saint Francis (PA) 1 – 7 2 – 9
† – Conference champion
^ – FCS playoff participant
Rankings from The Sports Network FCS Poll
2009 OVC football standings
Conf Overall
Team W L W L
#16 Jacksonville State 6 – 1 8 – 3
#19 Eastern Illinois 6 – 2 8 – 4
Tennessee Tech 5 – 3 6 – 5
Eastern Kentucky 5 – 3 5 – 6
UT Martin 4 – 4 5 – 6
Tennessee State 3 – 4 4 – 7
Austin Peay 3 – 5 4 – 7
Murray State 2 – 6 3 – 8
Southeast Missouri State 1 – 8 2 – 9
† – Conference champion
^ – FCS playoff participant
  • Jacksonville State had the best record in conference play, but was not eligible for the FCS playoffs because of APR violations.
    Rankings from The Sports Network FCS Poll
2009 Patriot League football standings
Conf Overall
Team W L W L
#14 Holy Cross 5 – 1 9 – 3
#21 Colgate 4 – 2 9 – 2
#24 Lafayette 4 – 2 8 – 3
Lehigh 4 – 2 4 – 7
Fordham 2 – 4 5 – 6
Bucknell 2 – 4 4 – 7
Georgetown 0 – 6 0 – 11
† – Conference champion
^ – FCS playoff participant
Rankings from The Sports Network FCS Poll
2009 Pioneer Football League standings
Conf Overall
Team W L W L
Butler 7 – 1 11 – 1
Dayton 7 – 1 9 – 2
Drake 6 – 2 8 – 3
Jacksonville 6 – 2 7 – 4
Marist 5 – 3 7 – 4
San Diego 3 – 5 4 – 7
Davidson 3 – 5 3 – 7
Campbell 2 – 6 3 – 8
Morehead State 1 – 7 3 – 8
Valparaiso 0 – 8 1 – 10
§ – Conference co-champions
Rankings from The Sports Network FCS Poll
2009 Southern Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team W L W L
#3 Appalachian State 8 – 0 11 – 3
#9 Elon 7 – 1 9 – 3
Furman 5 – 3 6 – 5
Chattanooga 4 – 4 6 – 5
Georgia Southern 4 – 4 5 – 6
Samford 3 – 5 5 – 6
Wofford 2 – 6 3 – 8
The Citadel 2 – 6 4 – 7
Western Carolina 1 – 7 2 – 9
† – Conference champion
^ – FCS playoff participant
Rankings from The Sports Network FCS Poll
2009 Southland Conference football standings
Conf Overall
Team W L W L
#10 Stephen F. Austin 6 – 1 10 – 3
#12 McNeese State 6 – 1 9 – 2
#25 Texas State 5 – 2 7 – 4
Southeastern Louisiana 4 – 3 6 – 5
Sam Houston State 3 – 4 5 – 6
Central Arkansas 2 – 5 5 – 6
Nicholls State 2 – 5 3 – 9
Northwestern State 0 – 7 0 – 11
§ – Conference co-champions
^ – FCS playoff participant
Rankings from The Sports Network FCS Poll
2009 SWAC football standings
Conf Overall
Team W L W L
East
Alabama A&M x 4 – 3 7 – 5
Alcorn State 3 – 4 3 – 6
Jackson State 3 – 5 3 – 7
Alabama State 1 – 6 4 – 7
Mississippi Valley State 1 – 7 3 – 8
West
#15 Prairie View A&M x 7 – 0 9 – 1
Grambling State 5 – 3 7 – 5
Texas Southern 5 – 2 6 – 5
Arkansas-Pine Bluff 4 – 4 6 – 5
Southern 3 – 5 6 – 6
Championship: Prairie View A&M 30, Alabama A&M 24
December 12, 2009
† – Conference champion
x – Division champion/co-champions
Rankings from The Sports Network FCS Poll
2009 Division I FCS independents football standings
Conf Overall
Team W L W L
Old Dominion – 9 – 2
North Carolina Central – 4 – 7
Lamar – 2 – 8
Savannah State – 2 – 8
Rankings from The Sports Network FCS Poll

Read more about this topic:  2009 NCAA Division I FCS Football Season

Famous quotes containing the word conference:

    “Politics is still the man’s game. The women are allowed to do the chores, the dirty work, and now and then—but only occasionally—one is present at some secret conference or other. But it’s not the rule. They can go out and get the vote, if they can and will; they can collect money, they can be grateful for being permitted to work. But that is all.”
    —Mary Roberts Rinehart (1876–1958)