Solution
The idea is to break-down the problem by classifying the networks as essentially series and essentially parallel networks.
- An essentially series network is a network which can be broken down into two or more subnetworks in series.
- An essentially parallel network is a network which can be broken down into two or more subnetworks in parallel.
By the duality of networks, it can be proved that the number of essentially series networks is equal to the number of essentially parallel networks. Thus for all n > 1, the number of networks in n edges is twice the number of essentially series networks. For n = 1, the number of networks is 1.
Define
- as the number of series-parallel networks on n indistinguishable edges.
- as the number of essentially series networks.
Then
can be found out by enumerating the partitions of .
Consider a partition, of n:
Consider the essentially series networks whose components correspond to the partition above. That is the number of components with i edges is . The number of such networks can be computed as
Hence
where the summation is over all partitions, of n except for the trivial partition consisting of only n.
This gives a recurrence for computing . Now can be computed as above.
Read more about this topic: Series-parallel Networks Problem
Famous quotes containing the word solution:
“The Settlement ... is an experimental effort to aid in the solution of the social and industrial problems which are engendered by the modern conditions of life in a great city. It insists that these problems are not confined to any one portion of the city. It is an attempt to relieve, at the same time, the overaccumulation at one end of society and the destitution at the other ...”
—Jane Addams (1860–1935)
“Coming out, all the way out, is offered more and more as the political solution to our oppression. The argument goes that, if people could see just how many of us there are, some in very important places, the negative stereotype would vanish overnight. ...It is far more realistic to suppose that, if the tenth of the population that is gay became visible tomorrow, the panic of the majority of people would inspire repressive legislation of a sort that would shock even the pessimists among us.”
—Jane Rule (b. 1931)
“I can’t quite define my aversion to asking questions of strangers. From snatches of family battles which I have heard drifting up from railway stations and street corners, I gather that there are a great many men who share my dislike for it, as well as an equal number of women who ... believe it to be the solution to most of this world’s problems.”
—Robert Benchley (1889–1945)