Description of The Method
As in Newton's method, one uses a second order approximation to find the minimum of a function . The Taylor series of around an iterate is:
where is the gradient and an approximation to the Hessian matrix. The gradient of this approximation (with respect to ) is
and setting this gradient to zero provides the Newton step:
The Hessian approximation is chosen to satisfy
which is called the secant equation (the Taylor series of the gradient itself). In more than one dimension is under determined. In one dimension, solving for and applying the Newton's step with the updated value is equivalent to the secant method. The various quasi-Newton methods differ in their choice of the solution to the secant equation (in one dimension, all the variants are equivalent). Most methods (but with exceptions, such as Broyden's method) seek a symmetric solution ; furthermore, the variants listed below can be motivated by finding an update that is as close as possible to in some norm; that is, where is some positive definite matrix matrix that defines the norm. An approximate initial value of is often sufficient to achieve rapid convergence. The unknown is updated applying the Newton's step calculated using the current approximate Hessian matrix
- , with chosen to satisfy the Wolfe conditions;
- ;
- The gradient computed at the new point, and
is used to update the approximate Hessian, or directly its inverse using the Sherman-Morrison formula.
- A key property of the BFGS and DFP updates is that if is positive definite and is chosen to satisfy the Wolfe conditions then is also positive definite.
The most popular update formulas are:
| Method | ||
|---|---|---|
| DFP | ||
| BFGS | ![]() |
|
| Broyden | ||
| Broyden family | ||
| SR1 |
Read more about this topic: Quasi-Newton Method
Famous quotes containing the words description of the, description of, description and/or method:
“The next Augustan age will dawn on the other side of the Atlantic. There will, perhaps, be a Thucydides at Boston, a Xenophon at New York, and, in time, a Virgil at Mexico, and a Newton at Peru. At last, some curious traveller from Lima will visit England and give a description of the ruins of St. Pauls, like the editions of Balbec and Palmyra.”
—Horace Walpole (17171797)
“Why does philosophy use concepts and why does faith use symbols if both try to express the same ultimate? The answer, of course, is that the relation to the ultimate is not the same in each case. The philosophical relation is in principle a detached description of the basic structure in which the ultimate manifests itself. The relation of faith is in principle an involved expression of concern about the meaning of the ultimate for the faithful.”
—Paul Tillich (18861965)
“It [Egypt] has more wonders in it than any other country in the world and provides more works that defy description than any other place.”
—Herodotus (c. 484424 B.C.)
“Argument is conclusive ... but ... it does not remove doubt, so that the mind may rest in the sure knowledge of the truth, unless it finds it by the method of experiment.... For if any man who never saw fire proved by satisfactory arguments that fire burns ... his hearers mind would never be satisfied, nor would he avoid the fire until he put his hand in it ... that he might learn by experiment what argument taught.”
—Roger Bacon (c. 12141294)
