Dependent Variables and Change of Variables
If the probability density function of a random variable X is given as fX(x), it is possible (but often not necessary; see below) to calculate the probability density function of some variable Y = g(X). This is also called a “change of variable” and is in practice used to generate a random variable of arbitrary shape fg(X) = fY using a known (for instance uniform) random number generator.
If the function g is monotonic, then the resulting density function is
Here g−1 denotes the inverse function.
This follows from the fact that the probability contained in a differential area must be invariant under change of variables. That is,
or
For functions which are not monotonic the probability density function for y is
where n(y) is the number of solutions in x for the equation g(x) = y, and g−1k(y) are these solutions.
It is tempting to think that in order to find the expected value E(g(X)) one must first find the probability density fg(X) of the new random variable Y = g(X). However, rather than computing
one may find instead
The values of the two integrals are the same in all cases in which both X and g(X) actually have probability density functions. It is not necessary that g be a one-to-one function. In some cases the latter integral is computed much more easily than the former.
Read more about this topic: Probability Density Function
Famous quotes containing the words dependent, variables and/or change:
“Now wait a minute. You listen to me. I’m an advertising man, not a red herring. I’ve got a job, a secretary, a mother, two ex- wives, and several bartenders dependent on me. And I don’t intend to disappoint them all by getting myself slightly killed.”
—Ernest Lehman (b.1920)
“The variables are surprisingly few.... One can whip or be whipped; one can eat excrement or quaff urine; mouth and private part can be meet in this or that commerce. After which there is the gray of morning and the sour knowledge that things have remained fairly generally the same since man first met goat and woman.”
—George Steiner (b. 1929)
“Although good early childhood programs can benefit all children, they are not a quick fix for all of society’s ills—from crime in the streets to adolescent pregnancy, from school failure to unemployment. We must emphasize that good quality early childhood programs can help change the social and educational outcomes for many children, but they are not a panacea; they cannot ameliorate the effects of all harmful social and psychological environments.”
—Barbara Bowman (20th century)