Yttrium Barium Copper Oxide - History

History

In April 1986 (seventy-five years after the discovery of superconductivity in 1911), Georg Bednorz and Karl Müller, working at IBM in Zurich, discovered that certain semiconducting oxides became superconducting at 35 K, then considered a relatively high temperature. In particular, the lanthanum barium copper oxides, an oxygen deficient perovskite-related material, proved promising. In 1987, Bednorz and Müller were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for this work.

Building on that, M.K. Wu and his graduate students, Ashburn and Torng at the University of Alabama in Huntsville in 1987, and Paul Chu and his students at the University of Houston in 1987 (see superconductor page for info), discovered YBCO has a Tc of 93 K. (The first samples were Y1.2Ba0.8CuO4.) Their work led to a rapid succession of new high temperature superconducting materials, ushering in a new era in material science and chemistry.

YBCO was the first material to become superconducting above 77 K, the boiling point of liquid nitrogen. All materials developed before 1986 became superconducting only at temperatures near the boiling points of liquid helium (Tb = 4.2 K) or liquid hydrogen (Tb = 20.28 K) — the highest being Nb3Ge at 23 K. The significance of the discovery of YBCO is the much lower cost of the refrigerant used to cool the material to below the critical temperature.

Read more about this topic:  Yttrium Barium Copper Oxide

Famous quotes containing the word history:

    “The only thing worse than a liar is a liar that’s also a hypocrite!
    There are only two great currents in the history of mankind: the baseness which makes conservatives and the envy which makes revolutionaries.”
    —Edmond De Goncourt (1822–1896)

    “If you look at the 150 years of modern China’s history since the Opium Wars, then you can’t avoid the conclusion that the last 15 years are the best 15 years in China’s modern history.”
    —J. Stapleton Roy (b. 1935)

    “To summarize the contentions of this paper then. Firstly, the phrase ‘the meaning of a word’ is a spurious phrase. Secondly and consequently, a re-examination is needed of phrases like the two which I discuss, ‘being a part of the meaning of’ and ‘having the same meaning.’ On these matters, dogmatists require prodding: although history indeed suggests that it may sometimes be better to let sleeping dogmatists lie.”
    —J.L. (John Langshaw)