Issue
Children of William IV of the United Kingdom| Name | Birth | Death | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| By Dorothea Bland | |||
| George FitzClarence | 29 January 1794 | 20 March 1842 | Married Mary Wyndham, had issue. Committed suicide aged 48. |
| Henry FitzClarence | 27 March 1795 | September 1817 | Died unmarried, aged 22. |
| Sophia FitzClarence | August 1796 | 10 April 1837 | Married Philip Sidney, 1st Baron De L'Isle and Dudley and had issue. |
| Mary FitzClarence | 19 December 1798 | 13 July 1864 | Married Charles Richard Fox, no issue. |
| Lord Frederick FitzClarence | 9 December 1799 | 30 October 1854 | Married Lady Augusta Boyle, one surviving daughter. |
| Elizabeth FitzClarence | 17 January 1801 | 16 January 1856 | Married William Hay, 18th Earl of Erroll, had issue. |
| Lord Adolphus FitzClarence | 18 February 1802 | 17 May 1856 | Died unmarried. |
| Augusta FitzClarence | 17 November 1803 | 8 December 1865 | Married two times, had issue. |
| Augustus FitzClarence | 1 March 1805 | 14 June 1854 | Married Sarah Gordon, had issue. |
| Amelia FitzClarence | 21 March 1807 | 2 July 1858 | Married Lucius Cary, 10th Viscount Falkland, had one son. |
| By Adelaide of Saxe-Meiningen | |||
| Charlotte Augusta Louisa | 27 March 1819 | Died right after being baptised, in Hanover. | |
| Stillborn child | 5 September 1819 | Born dead at Dunkirk. | |
| Elizabeth Georgiana Adelaide | 10 December 1820 | 4 March 1821 | Born and died at St James's Palace. |
| Stillborn child | 23 April 1822 | Born dead at Bushy Park. | |
| Stillborn twins | 1824 | Twin boys, born dead at Bushy Park. | |
Read more about this topic: William IV Of The United Kingdom
Famous quotes containing the word issue:
“The issue is privacy. Why is the decision by a woman to sleep with a man she has just met in a bar a private one, and the decision to sleep with the same man for $100 subject to criminal penalties?”
—Anna Quindlen (b. 1952)
“Most people see no reason to stop arguing just because an issue has been decided.”
—Mason Cooley (b. 1927)
“Take away from the courts, if it could be taken away, the power to issue injunctions in labor disputes, and it would create a privileged class among the laborers and save the lawless among their number from a most needful remedy available to all men for the protection of their business interests against unlawful invasion.... The secondary boycott is an instrument of tyranny, and ought not to be made legitimate.”
—William Howard Taft (1857–1930)