Van Der Waerden Test - Test Definition

Test Definition

Let nj (j = 1, 2, ..., k) represent the sample sizes for each of the k groups (i.e., samples) in the data. Let N denote the sample size for all groups. Let Xij represent the ith value in the jth group. The normal scores are computed as

A_{ij} = \Phi^{-1}\left(\frac{R(X_{ij})}{N+1}\right)

where R(Xij) denotes the rank of observation Xij and where Φ-1 denotes the normal quantile function. The average of the normal scores for each sample can then be computed as

\bar{A}_j = \frac{1}{n_j}\sum_{i=1}^{n_j}A_{ij}\quad j=1,2,\ldots, k

The variance of the normal scores can be computed as

s^2 = \frac{1}{N-1}\sum_{j=1}^k\sum_{i=1}^{n_j}A_{ij}^2

The Van Der Waerden test can then be defined as follows:

H0: All of the k population distribution functions are identical
Ha: At least one of the populations tends to yield larger observations than at least one of the other populations

The test statistic is

T_1 = \frac{1}{s^2}\sum_{j=1}^kn_j\bar{A}_j^2

For significance level α, the critical region is

T_1 > \chi_{\alpha,k-1}^2

where Χα,k − 12 is the α-quantile of the chi-squared distribution with k − 1 degrees of freedom. The null hypothesis is rejected if the test statistic is in the critical region. If the hypothesis of identical distributions is rejected, one can perform a multiple comparisons procedure to determine which pairs of populations tend to differ. The populations j1 and j2 seem to be different if the following inequality is satisfied:

\left\vert \bar{A}_{j_1} - \bar{A}_{j_2}\right\vert > s \,t_{1-\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{N-1-T_1}{N-k}}\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_{j_1}}+\frac{1}{n_{j_2}}}

with t1 − α/2 the (1 − α/2)-quantile of the t-distribution.

Read more about this topic:  Van Der Waerden Test

Famous quotes containing the words test and/or definition:

    “A test of what is real is that it is hard and rough. Joys are found in it, not pleasure. What is pleasant belongs to dreams.”
    —Simone Weil (1909–1943)

    “The physicians say, they are not materialists; but they are:MSpirit is matter reduced to an extreme thinness: O so thin!—But the definition of spiritual should be, that which is its own evidence. What notions do they attach to love! what to religion! One would not willingly pronounce these words in their hearing, and give them the occasion to profane them.”
    —Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)