Uniform Boundedness Principle
The precise statement of the result is:
Theorem. Let X be a Banach space and Y be a normed vector space. Suppose that F is a collection of continuous linear operators from X to Y. The uniform boundedness principle states that if for all x in X we have
then
The completeness of X enables the following short proof, using the Baire category theorem:
Proof.
- Define the closed sets Xn with n = 1, 2, 3, … by
- By hypothesis, the union of all the Xn is X. Since X is a Baire space, one of the Xn, say Xm, has an interior point (Xn are closed sets), i.e., there exists a δ > 0 and a y in X such that all x ∈ X with ||x − y|| < δ are elements of Xm. Now, choose an arbitrary z in X with ||z|| < δ. Then, y and y + z are elements of Xm and hence, for every operator T in the family F, ||T(z)|| ≤ ||T(y + z)|| + ||T(y)|| ≤ m + m = 2m. Since z is arbitrary in the ball of radius δ, it follows that ||T|| ≤ 2m / δ for all T in F, which proves the theorem.
A direct consequence is:
Corollary. If a sequence of bounded operators (Tn) converges pointwise, that is, lim Tn(x) exists for all x in X, then these pointwise limits define a bounded operator T.
Note it is not claimed above that Tn converges to T in operator norm, i.e. uniformly on bounded sets. (However, since {Tn} is bounded in operator norm, and the limit operator T is continuous, a standard "3-ε" estimate shows that Tn converges to T uniformly on compact sets.)
Another corollary is that any weakly bounded subset S in a normed space Y is bounded; indeed, the elements of S define a pointwise bounded family of continuous linear forms on the Banach space X = Y∗, continuous dual of Y. By the uniform boundedness principle, the norms of elements of S, as functionals on X, that is, norms in the second dual Y∗∗, are bounded. But for every s ∈ S, the norm in the second dual coincides with the norm in Y, by a consequence of the Hahn–Banach theorem.
Let L(X, Y) denote the continuous operators from X to Y, with the operator norm. If the collection F is unbounded in L(X, Y), then by the uniform boundedness principle, the set
is not empty. In fact, it is dense in X. The complement of R in X is the countable union of closed sets ∪Xn. By the argument used in proving the theorem, each Xn is nowhere dense, i.e. the subset ∪Xn is of first category. Therefore R is the complement of a subset of first category in a Baire space. By definition of a Baire space, such sets (called residual sets) are dense. Such reasoning leads to the principle of condensation of singularities, which can be formulated as follows:
Theorem. Let X be a Banach space, {Yn} a sequence of normed vector spaces, and Fn a unbounded family in L(X, Yn). Then the set
is dense in X.
Proof.
- The complement of R is the countable union
- of sets of first category. Therefore its residual set R is dense.
Read more about this topic: Uniform Boundedness Principle
Famous quotes containing the words uniform and/or principle:
“We call ourselves a free nation, and yet we let ourselves be told what cabs we can and cant take by a man at a hotel door, simply because he has a drum majors uniform on.”
—Robert Benchley (18891945)
“The principle of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation.”
—French National Assembly. Declaration of the Rights of Man (Sept. 1791)