A Common Resolution
A common way to resolve the paradox, both in popular literature and in the academic literature in philosophy, is to observe that A stands for different things at different places in the expected value calculation, step 7 above. In the first term A is the smaller amount while in the second term A is the larger amount. To mix different instances of a variable in the same formula like this is said to be illegitimate, so step 7 is incorrect, and this is the cause of the paradox.
According to this analysis, a correct alternative argument would have run on the following lines. Assume that there are only two possible sums that might be in the envelope. Denoting the lower of the two amounts by X, we can rewrite the expected value calculation as
Here X stands for the same thing in every term of the equation. We learn that 1.5X is the average expected value in either of the envelopes, hence no reason to swap envelopes according to this calculation.
Read more about this topic: Two Envelopes Problem
Famous quotes containing the words common and/or resolution:
“I have thought there was some advantage even in death, by which we “mingle with the herd of common men.””
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)
“A great many will find fault in the resolution that the negro shall be free and equal, because our equal not every human being can be; but free every human being has a right to be. He can only be equal in his rights.”
—Mrs. Chalkstone, U.S. suffragist. As quoted in History of Woman Suffrage, vol. 2, ch. 16, by Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, and Matilda Joslyn Gage (1882)