A Common Resolution
A common way to resolve the paradox, both in popular literature and in the academic literature in philosophy, is to observe that A stands for different things at different places in the expected value calculation, step 7 above. In the first term A is the smaller amount while in the second term A is the larger amount. To mix different instances of a variable in the same formula like this is said to be illegitimate, so step 7 is incorrect, and this is the cause of the paradox.
According to this analysis, a correct alternative argument would have run on the following lines. Assume that there are only two possible sums that might be in the envelope. Denoting the lower of the two amounts by X, we can rewrite the expected value calculation as
Here X stands for the same thing in every term of the equation. We learn that 1.5X is the average expected value in either of the envelopes, hence no reason to swap envelopes according to this calculation.
Read more about this topic: Two Envelopes Problem
Famous quotes containing the words common and/or resolution:
“Farmers in overalls and wide-brimmed straw hats lounge about the store on hot summer days, when the most common sound is the thump-thump-thump of a hound’s leg on the floor as he scratches contentedly. Oldtime hunters say that fleas are a hound’s salvation: his constant twisting and clawing in pursuit of the tormentors keeps his joints supple.”
—Administration in the State of Arka, U.S. public relief program (1935-1943)
“It is a part of the American character to consider nothing as desperate; to surmount every difficulty by resolution and contrivance.”
—Thomas Jefferson (1743–1826)