The Number of Total Preorders
The number of distinct total preorders on an n-element set is given by the following sequence (sequence A000670 in OEIS):
| Number of n-element binary relations of different types | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | all | transitive | reflexive | preorder | partial order | total preorder | total order | equivalence relation |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 16 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 512 | 171 | 64 | 29 | 19 | 13 | 6 | 5 |
| 4 | 65536 | 3994 | 4096 | 355 | 219 | 75 | 24 | 15 |
| OEIS | A002416 | A006905 | A053763 | A000798 | A001035 | A000670 | A000142 | A000110 |
These numbers are also called the Fubini numbers or ordered Bell numbers.
As explained above, there is a 1-to-1 correspondence between total preorders and pairs (partition, total order). Thus the number of total preorders is the sum of the number of total orders on every partition. For example:
- for n = 3:
- 1 partition of 3, giving 1 total preorder (each element is related to each element)
- 3 partitions of 2 + 1, giving 3 × 2 = 6 total preorders
- 1 partition of 1 + 1 + 1, giving 6 total preorders (the total orders)
- i.e. together 13 total preorders.
- for n = 4:
- 1 partition of 4, giving 1 total preorder (each element is related to each element)
- 7 partitions with two classes (4 of 3 + 1 and 3 of 2 + 2), giving 7 × 2 = 14 total preorders
- 6 partitions of 2+1+1, giving 6 × 6 = 36 total preorders
- 1 partition of 1+1+1+1, giving 24 total preorders (the total orders)
- i.e. together 75 total preorders.
Compare the Bell numbers, here 5 and 15: the number of partitions, i.e., the number of equivalence relations.
Read more about this topic: Strict Weak Ordering
Famous quotes containing the words number and/or total:
“Cole’s Hill was the scene of the secret night burials of those who died during the first year of the settlement. Corn was planted over their graves so that the Indians should not know how many of their number had perished.”
—For the State of Massachusetts, U.S. public relief program (1935-1943)
““Never hug and kiss your children! Mother love may make your children’s infancy unhappy and prevent them from pursuing a career or getting married!” That’s total hogwash, of course. But it shows on extreme example of what state-of-the-art “scientific” parenting was supposed to be in early twentieth-century America. After all, that was the heyday of efficiency experts, time-and-motion studies, and the like.”
—Lawrence Kutner (20th century)