The Number of Total Preorders
The number of distinct total preorders on an n-element set is given by the following sequence (sequence A000670 in OEIS):
| Number of n-element binary relations of different types | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | all | transitive | reflexive | preorder | partial order | total preorder | total order | equivalence relation |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 16 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 512 | 171 | 64 | 29 | 19 | 13 | 6 | 5 |
| 4 | 65536 | 3994 | 4096 | 355 | 219 | 75 | 24 | 15 |
| OEIS | A002416 | A006905 | A053763 | A000798 | A001035 | A000670 | A000142 | A000110 |
These numbers are also called the Fubini numbers or ordered Bell numbers.
As explained above, there is a 1-to-1 correspondence between total preorders and pairs (partition, total order). Thus the number of total preorders is the sum of the number of total orders on every partition. For example:
- for n = 3:
- 1 partition of 3, giving 1 total preorder (each element is related to each element)
- 3 partitions of 2 + 1, giving 3 × 2 = 6 total preorders
- 1 partition of 1 + 1 + 1, giving 6 total preorders (the total orders)
- i.e. together 13 total preorders.
- for n = 4:
- 1 partition of 4, giving 1 total preorder (each element is related to each element)
- 7 partitions with two classes (4 of 3 + 1 and 3 of 2 + 2), giving 7 × 2 = 14 total preorders
- 6 partitions of 2+1+1, giving 6 × 6 = 36 total preorders
- 1 partition of 1+1+1+1, giving 24 total preorders (the total orders)
- i.e. together 75 total preorders.
Compare the Bell numbers, here 5 and 15: the number of partitions, i.e., the number of equivalence relations.
Read more about this topic: Strict Weak Ordering
Famous quotes containing the words number and/or total:
“A great number of the disappointments and mishaps of the troubled world are the direct result of literature and the allied arts. It is our belief that no human being who devotes his life and energy to the manufacture of fantasies can be anything but fundamentally inadequate”
—Christopher Hampton (b. 1946)
“The totality of our so-called knowledge or beliefs, from the most casual matters of geography and history to the profoundest laws of atomic physics or even of pure mathematics and logic, is a man-made fabric which impinges on experience only along the edges. Or, to change the figure, total science is like a field of force whose boundary conditions are experience.”
—Willard Van Orman Quine (b. 1908)