Scale
STI is a numeric representation measure of communication channel characteristics whose value varies from 0 = bad to 1 = excellent. On this scale, an STI of at least .5 is desirable for most applications.
Barnett (1995, 1999) proposed to use a reference scale, the Common Intelligibility Scale (CIS), based on a mathematical relation with STI (CIS = 1 + log (STI)).
STI predicts the likelihood of syllables, words and sentences being comprehended. As an example, for native speakers, this likelihood is given by:
| STI Value | Quality according to IEC 60268-16 | Intelligibility of Syllables in % | Intelligibility of Words in % | Intelligibility of Sentences in % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 - 0.3 | bad | 0 - 34 | 0 - 67 | 0 - 89 |
| 0.3 - 0.45 | poor | 34 - 48 | 67 - 78 | 89 - 92 |
| 0.45 - 0.6 | fair | 48 - 67 | 78 - 87 | 92 - 95 |
| 0.6 - 0.75 | good | 67 - 90 | 87 - 94 | 95 - 96 |
| 0.75 - 1 | excellent | 90 - 96 | 94 - 96 | 96 - 100 |
If non-native speakers, people with speech disorders or hard-of-hearing people are involved, other probabilities hold.
It is interesting but not astonishing that STI prediction is independent of the language spoken - not astonishing, as the ability of the channel to transport patterns of physical speech is measured.
Another method is defined for computing a physical measure that is highly correlated with the intelligibility of speech as evaluated by speech perception tests given a group of talkers and listeners. This measure is called the Speech Intelligibility Index, or SII.
Read more about this topic: Speech Transmission Index
Famous quotes containing the word scale:
“I love to weigh, to settle, to gravitate toward that which most strongly and rightfully attracts me;Mnot hang by the beam of the scale and try to weigh less,not suppose a case, but take the case that is; to travel the only path I can, and that on which no power can resist me. It affords me no satisfaction to commence to spring an arch before I have got a solid foundation.”
—Henry David Thoreau (18171862)
“I have spent all my life under a Communist regime, and I will tell you that a society without any objective legal scale is a terrible one indeed. But a society with no other scale but the legal one is not quite worthy of man either.”
—Alexander Solzhenitsyn (b. 1918)
“Tis very certain that each man carries in his eye the exact indication of his rank in the immense scale of men, and we are always learning to read it. A complete man should need no auxiliaries to his personal presence.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (18031882)