Comparison With Other JVM Languages
Scala is often compared with Groovy and Clojure, two other programming languages also built on top of the JVM. Among the main differences are:
- Scala is statically typed, while both Groovy and Clojure are dynamically typed. This adds complexity in the type system but allows many errors to be caught at compile time that would otherwise only manifest at runtime, and tends to result in significantly faster execution. (Note, however, that current versions of both Groovy and Clojure allow for optional type annotations, and Java 7 adds an "invoke dynamic" byte code that should aid in the execution of dynamic languages on the JVM. Both features should decrease the running time of Groovy and Clojure.)
- Compared with Groovy, Scala has more changes in its fundamental design. The primary purpose of Groovy was to make Java programming easier and less verbose, while Scala (in addition to having the same goal) was designed from the ground up to allow for a functional programming style in addition to object-oriented programming, and introduces a number of more "cutting-edge" features from functional programming languages like Haskell that are not often seen in mainstream languages.
- Compared with Clojure, Scala is less of an extreme transition for a Java programmer. Clojure inherits from Lisp and Scheme, with the result that it has a radically different syntax from Java and has a strong emphasis on functional programming while de-emphasizing object-oriented programming. Scala, on the other hand, maintains most of Java's syntax and attempts to be agnostic between object-oriented and functional programming styles, allowing either or both according to the programmer's taste.
Read more about this topic: Scala (programming Language)
Famous quotes containing the words comparison with, comparison and/or languages:
“Certainly there is not the fight recorded in Concord history, at least, if in the history of America, that will bear a moment’s comparison with this, whether for the numbers engaged in it, or for the patriotism and heroism displayed.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)
“Away with the cant of “Measures, not men!”Mthe idle supposition that it is the harness and not the horses that draw the chariot along. No, Sir, if the comparison must be made, if the distinction must be taken, men are everything, measures comparatively nothing.”
—George Canning (1770–1827)
“The trouble with foreign languages is, you have to think before your speak.”
—Swedish proverb, trans. by Verne Moberg.