Language
Sauk (or Sac) is a part of the Algonquian language family. It is very closely related to the varieties spoken by the Fox and the Kickapoo tribes, so the three are often described by linguists as dialects of the same language. Each of the dialects contains archaisms and innovations that distinguish them from each other, and Sauk and Fox appear to be the most closely related of the three (Goddard 1978). Sauk is also considered to be mutually intelligible, to a point, with Fox. In their own language, the Sauk at one time referred to themselves as asakiwaki, “people of the outlet. (Bonvillain 1995)”
The Sauk people have a syllabic orthography for their language and there exists a Primer Book which was printed in 1977 (based on a “traditional” syllabary which existed in 1906), so that the modern-day Sauk people may learn to write as well as speak their ancestral tongue. A newer orthography was proposed around 1994 to better aid in language revival, since the former syllabary was targeted towards the few remaining native speakers of Sauk; the more recent orthography was presented with native English speakers in mind (Müller 1994).
Sauk has so few speakers that it is considered one of the many endangered languages native to North America.
In 2012, Shawnee High School in Shawnee, Oklahoma began to offer a Sauk language course.
Read more about this topic: Sauk People
Famous quotes containing the word language:
“... language is meaningful because it is the expression of thoughts—of thoughts which are about something.”
—Roderick M. Chisholm (b. 1916)
“When a language creates—as it does—a community within the present, it does so only by courtesy of a community between the present and the past.”
—Christopher Ricks (b. 1933)
“The reader uses his eyes as well as or instead of his ears and is in every way encouraged to take a more abstract view of the language he sees. The written or printed sentence lends itself to structural analysis as the spoken does not because the reader’s eye can play back and forth over the words, giving him time to divide the sentence into visually appreciated parts and to reflect on the grammatical function.”
—J. David Bolter (b. 1951)