Comparison With Monolithic Arrays
Advantages:
- Ropes enable much faster insertion and deletion of text than monolithic string arrays, on which operations have time complexity O(n).
- Ropes don't require the extra O(n) memory that arrays need for copying operations, and ropes don't require large contiguous memory spaces.
Disadvantages:
- Slightly greater overall space usage (mainly to store parent nodes)
- Increase in time to manage the extra storage
This table compares the algorithmic characteristics of string and rope implementations, not their "raw speed". Array-based strings have smaller overhead, so (for example) concatenation and split operations are faster on small datasets. However, when array-based strings are used for longer strings, time complexity and memory usage for insertion and deletion of characters become unacceptably large. A rope data structure, on the other hand, has stable performance regardless of data size. Moreover, the space complexity for ropes and arrays are both O(n). In summary, ropes are better suited when the data is large and frequently modified.
| Operation | Rope | String |
|---|---|---|
| Index | O(log n) | O(1) |
| Split | O(log n) | O(1) |
| Concatenate | O(log n) | O(n) |
| Iterate over each character | O(n) | O(n) |
| Insert | O(log n) | O(n) |
| Delete | O(log n) | O(n) |
| Report | O(j + log n) | O(j) |
| Build | O(n) | O(n) |
Read more about this topic: Rope (computer Science)
Famous quotes containing the words comparison with, comparison and/or monolithic:
“What is man in nature? A nothing in comparison with the infinite, an all in comparison with the nothing—a mean between nothing and everything.”
—Blaise Pascal (1623–1662)
“From top to bottom of the ladder, greed is aroused without knowing where to find ultimate foothold. Nothing can calm it, since its goal is far beyond all it can attain. Reality seems valueless by comparison with the dreams of fevered imaginations; reality is therefore abandoned.”
—Emile Durkheim (1858–1917)
“Peer pressure is not a monolithic force that presses adolescents into the same mold. . . . Adolescents generally choose friend whose values, attitudes, tastes, and families are similar to their own. In short, good kids rarely go bad because of their friends.”
—Laurence Steinberg (20th century)