Formal Definitions
The variables in the polynomial ring
are always sorted as x1 < ... < xn. A non-constant polynomial f in can be seen as a univariate polynomial in its greatest variable. The greatest variable in f is called its main variable, denoted by mvar(f). Let u be the main variable of f and write it as
- ,
where e is the degree of f w.r.t. u and is the leading coefficient of f w.r.t. u. Then the initial of f is and e is its main degree.
- Triangular set
A non-empty subset T of is a triangular set, if the polynomials in T are non-constant and have distinct main variables. Hence, a triangular set is finite, and has cardinality at most n.
- Regular chain
Let T = {t1, ..., ts} be a triangular set such that mvar(t1) < ... < mvar(ts), be the initial of ti and h be the product of hi's. Then T is a regular chain if
,
where each resultant is computed with respect to the main variable of ti, respectively. This definition is from Yang and Zhang, which is of much algorithmic flavor.
- Quasi-component and saturated ideal of a regular chain
The quasi-component W(T) described by the regular chain T is
- , that is,
the set difference of the varieties V(T) and V(h). The attached algebraic object of a regular chain is its saturated ideal
- .
A classic result is that the Zariski closure of W(T) equals the variety defined by sat(T), that is,
- ,
and its dimension is n - |T|, the difference of the number of variables and the number of polynomials in T.
- Triangular decompositions
In general, there are two ways to decompose a polynomial system F. The first one is to decompose lazily, that is, only to represent its generic points in the (Kalkbrener) sense,
- .
The second is to describe all zeroes in the Lazard sense,
- .
There are various algorithms available for triangular decompositions in either sense.
Read more about this topic: Regular Chain
Famous quotes containing the words formal and/or definitions:
“The conviction that the best way to prepare children for a harsh, rapidly changing world is to introduce formal instruction at an early age is wrong. There is simply no evidence to support it, and considerable evidence against it. Starting children early academically has not worked in the past and is not working now.”
—David Elkind (20th century)
“What I do not like about our definitions of genius is that there is in them nothing of the day of judgment, nothing of resounding through eternity and nothing of the footsteps of the Almighty.”
—G.C. (Georg Christoph)