Definition
Let N be a normal subgroup of a group G. We define the set G/N to be the set of all left cosets of N in G, i.e., G/N = { aN : a in G }. The group operation on G/N is the product of subsets defined above. In other words, for each aN and bN in G/N, the product of aN and bN is (aN)(bN). This operation is closed, because (aN)(bN) really is a left coset:
- (aN)(bN) = a(Nb)N = a(bN)N = (ab)NN = (ab)N.
The normality of N is used in this equation. Because of the normality of N, the left cosets and right cosets of N in G are equal, and so G/N could be defined as the set of right cosets of N in G. Because the operation is derived from the product of subsets of G, the operation is well-defined (does not depend on the particular choice of representatives), associative, and has identity element N. The inverse of an element aN of G/N is a−1N.
For example, consider the group with addition modulo 6:
- G = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5}.
Let
- N = {0, 3}.
The quotient group is:
- G/N = { aN : a ∈ G } = { a{0, 3} : a ∈ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5} } =
- { 0{0, 3}, 1{0, 3}, 2{0, 3}, 3{0, 3}, 4{0, 3}, 5{0, 3} } =
- { {(0+0) mod 6, (0+3) mod 6}, {(1+0) mod 6, (1+3) mod 6},
- {(2+0) mod 6, (2+3) mod 6}, {(3+0) mod 6, (3+3) mod 6},
- {(4+0) mod 6, (4+3) mod 6}, {(5+0) mod 6, (5+3) mod 6} } =
- { {0, 3}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 0}, {4, 1}, {5, 2} } =
- { {0, 3}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {0, 3}, {1, 4}, {2, 5} } =
- { {0, 3}, {1, 4}, {2, 5} }.
The basic argument above is still valid if G/N is defined to be the set of all right cosets.
Read more about this topic: Quotient Group
Famous quotes containing the word definition:
“One definition of man is an intelligence served by organs.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (18031882)
“The very definition of the real becomes: that of which it is possible to give an equivalent reproduction.... The real is not only what can be reproduced, but that which is always already reproduced. The hyperreal.”
—Jean Baudrillard (b. 1929)
“The man who knows governments most completely is he who troubles himself least about a definition which shall give their essence. Enjoying an intimate acquaintance with all their particularities in turn, he would naturally regard an abstract conception in which these were unified as a thing more misleading than enlightening.”
—William James (18421910)