In geometry, the power center of three circles, also called the radical center, is the intersection point of the three radical axes of the pairs of circles. If the radical center lies outside of all three circles, then it is the center of the unique circle (the radical circle) that intersects the three given circles orthogonally; the construction of this orthogonal circle corresponds to Monge's problem. This is a special case of the three conics theorem.
The three radical axes meet in a single point, the radical center, for the following reason. The radical axis of a pair of circles is defined as the set of points that have equal power h with respect to both circles. For example, for every point P on the radical axis of circles 1 and 2, the powers to each circle are equal, h1 = h2. Similarly, for every point on the radical axis of circles 2 and 3, the powers must be equal, h2 = h3. Therefore, at the intersection point of these two lines, all three powers must be equal, h1 = h2 = h3. Since this implies that h1 = h3, this point must also lie on the radical axis of circles 1 and 3. Hence, all three radical axes pass through the same point, the radical center.
The radical center has several applications in geometry. It has an important role in a solution to Apollonius' problem published by Joseph Diaz Gergonne in 1814. Several types of radical circles have been defined as well, such as the radical circle of the Lucas circles.
Famous quotes containing the words power and/or center:
“We have imagined ourselves a special creation, set apart from other humans. In the last twentieth century, we see that our poverty is as absolute as that of the poorest nations. We have attempted to deny the human condition in our quest for power after power. It would be well for us to rejoin the human race, to accept our essential poverty as a gift, and to share our material wealth with those in need.”
—Robert Neelly Bellah (20th century)
“There is nothing more natural than to consider everything as starting from oneself, chosen as the center of the world; one finds oneself thus capable of condemning the world without even wanting to hear its deceitful chatter.”
—Guy Debord (b. 1931)