Paul Morphy - Results

Results

Here are Morphy's results in matches and casual games not played at odds:

  • + games won; − games lost; = games drawn
Date Opponent Result Location Score Notes
1849−1850 Eugène Rousseau Won New Orleans ca. 45/50 ca. +45−5=0 casual
1849-1864 James McConnell Won New Orleans ca. 8/8 +8−0=0 probably casual
1850 Johann Löwenthal Won New Orleans 2½/3 +2−0=1 casual
1855 Alexander Beaufort Meek Won Mobile, AL 6/6 +6−0=0 casual
1855 A.D. Ayers Won Mobile, AL 2/2 +2−0=0 casual
1857 Alexander Beaufort Meek Won New Orleans 4/4 +4−0=0 casual
1857 James Thompson Won New York 3/3 +3−0=0 1st American Chess Congress, elim.
1857 Alexander Beaufort Meek Won New York 3/3 +3−0=0 1st American Chess Congress, q-final
1857 Theodor Lichtenhein Won New York 3½/4 +3−0=1 1st American Chess Congress, s-final
1857 Louis Paulsen Won New York 6/8 +5−1=2 1st American Chess Congress, final
1857 Louis Paulsen Won New York 3½/4 +3−0=1 casual
1857 Theodor Lichtenhein Won New York 2/3 +1−0=2 casual
1857 Alexander Beaufort Meek Won New York 2/2 +2−0=0 casual
1857 Daniel Fiske Won New York 3/3 +3−0=0 casual
1857 Napoleon Marache Won New York 3/3 +3−0=0 casual
1857 Samuel Calthrop Won New York 1/1 +1−0=0 casual
1857 Lewis Elkin Won New York 1/1 +1−0=0 casual
1857 William James Appleton Fuller Won New York 2/2 +2−0=0 casual
1857 Hiram Kennicott Won New York 1/1 +1−0=0 casual
1857 Charles Mead Won New York 1/1 +1−0=0 casual
1857 Hardman Montgomery Won New York 1/1 +1−0=0 casual
1857 David Parry Won New York 1/1 +1−0=0 casual
1857 Frederic Perrin Won New York 2/3 +1−0=2 casual
1857 Benjamin Raphael Won New York 1/1 +1−0=0 casual
1857 James Thompson Won New York 5/5 +5−0=0 casual
1857 George Hammond Won New York 15/16 +15−1=0 casual
1857 John William Schulten Won New York 23/24 +23−1=0 casual
1857 Charles Henry Stanley Won New York 12/13 +12−1=0 casual
1857 Daniel Fiske, W.J.A. Fuller, Frederick Perrin Lost Hoboken, NJ 0/1 +0−1=0 casual
1858 Thomas Barnes Won London 19½/27 +19−7=1 casual
1858 Samuel Boden Won London 7½/10 +6−1=3 casual
1858 Henry Edward Bird Won London 10½/12 +10−1=1 casual
1858 Edward Löwe Won London 6/6 +6−0=0 casual
1858 Thomas Hampton Won London 2/2 +2−0=0 casual
1858 George Webb Medley Won London 3/4 +3−1=0 casual
1858 John Owen Won London 4/5 +4−1=0 casual
1858 Johann Löwenthal Won London 10/14 +9−3=2 match
1858 Augustus Mongredien Won London 2/2 +2−0=0 casual
1858 Frederic Deacon Drew London 1/2 +1−1=0 casual
1858 James Kipping Won Birmingham 2/2 +2−0=0 casual
1858 Henri Baucher Won Paris 2/2 +2−0=0 casual
1858 Paul Journoud Won Paris 12/12 +12−0=0 casual
1858 H. Laroche Won Paris 6/7 +5−0=2 casual
1858 M. Chamouillet Won Versailles 1/1 +1−0=0 casual
1858 Pierre Charles Fournier de Saint-Amant Won Paris 1/1 +1−0=0 casual
1858 Jules Arnous de Rivière, Paul Journoud Lost Paris 0/1 +0−1=0 casual
1858 Jules Arnous de Rivière Won Paris 6½/8 +6−1=1 casual
1858 Daniel Harrwitz Won Paris 5½/8 +5−2=1 match
1858 Adolf Anderssen Won Paris 9/11 +7−2=2 match
1858 Adolf Anderssen Won Paris 5/6 +5−1=0 casual
1859 Augustus Mongredien Won Paris 7½/8 +7−0=1 match
1859 Wincenty Budzyński Won Paris 7/7 +7−0=0 casual
1859 A. Bousserolles Won Paris 1/1 +1−0=0 casual
1859 F. Schrufer Won Paris 1/1 +1−0=0 casual
1859 Johann Löwenthal Won London 1½/3 +1−1=1 casual
1859 George Hammond Won Boston 1/1 +1−0=0 casual
1862 Félix Sicre Won Havana 2/2 +2−0=0 casual
1863 Augustus Mongredien Won Paris 1/1 +1−0=0 casual
1863 Jules Arnous de Rivière Won Paris 9/12 +9−3=0 match

Read more about this topic:  Paul Morphy

Famous quotes containing the word results:

    “The peace conference must not adjourn without the establishment of some ordered system of international government, backed by power enough to give authority to its decrees. ... Unless a league something like this results at our peace conference, we shall merely drop back into armed hostility and international anarchy. The war will have been fought in vain ...”
    —Virginia Crocheron Gildersleeve (1877–1965)

    ““The ideal reasoner,” he remarked, “would, when he had once been shown a single fact in all its bearings, deduce from it not only all the chain of events which led up to it but also all the results which would follow from it.””
    —Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859–1930)

    “How can you tell if you discipline effectively? Ask yourself if your disciplinary methods generally produce lasting results in a manner you find acceptable. Whether your philosophy is democratic or autocratic, whatever techniques you use—reasoning, a “star” chart, time-outs, or spanking—if it doesn’t work, it’s not effective.”
    —Stanley Turecki (20th century)