Impact
The extent to which Taxable and Glimmer were successful has been debated. All three operations were complicated in execution, requiring the coordination of air and naval forces in poor conditions. Poor weather conditions meant that Taxable did not appear to have the desired effect and failed to elicit any response from the Germans. The reaction to Glimmer was more encouraging. The attacks on the bomber squadrons indicated, at least to the satisfaction of RAF Bomber Command, that the Germans believed a genuine threat existed. There is no evidence that Big Drum elicited any specific response from the shore. All of these factors contributed to making the operations less effective than the planners might have envisioned.
Although disappointed not to have seen any "action" during the night of D-Day, and still unclear what impact they had had, the bomber crews felt proud of the operations. Squadron Leader Les Munro, of No. 617 Squadron, wrote, "I have always considered the operation in one sense to be the most important the squadron carried out in my time – not because bad weather, nor because of any threat of enemy action and not measured by any visible results, but because of the very exacting requirements to which we had to fly and navigate".
From intelligence intercepts it appears that German forces in the Pas de Calais region reported an invasion fleet, and there are reports of the decoys being fired on by shore batteries. In an 11 June report on the operations, Lieutenant Commander Ian Cox (who was in charge of deception units) indicated that German forces had been convinced by the fake radio traffic. Intercepted dispatches from Hiroshi Ōshima, the Japanese ambassador to Germany, made reference to the naval deceptions. An 8 June report referred to the Calais region and stated "an enemy squadron that had been operating there has now withdrawn".
Read more about this topic: Operation Taxable
Famous quotes containing the word impact:
“Television does not dominate or insist, as movies do. It is not sensational, but taken for granted. Insistence would destroy it, for its message is so dire that it relies on being the background drone that counters silence. For most of us, it is something turned on and off as we would the light. It is a service, not a luxury or a thing of choice.”
—David Thomson, U.S. film historian. America in the Dark: The Impact of Hollywood Films on American Culture, ch. 8, William Morrow (1977)
“If the federal government had been around when the Creator was putting His hand to this state, Indiana wouldn’t be here. It’d still be waiting for an environmental impact statement.”
—Ronald Reagan (b. 1911)
“One can describe a landscape in many different words and sentences, but one would not normally cut up a picture of a landscape and rearrange it in different patterns in order to describe it in different ways. Because a photograph is not composed of discrete units strung out in a linear row of meaningful pieces, we do not understand it by looking at one element after another in a set sequence. The photograph is understood in one act of seeing; it is perceived in a gestalt.”
—Joshua Meyrowitz, U.S. educator, media critic. “The Blurring of Public and Private Behaviors,” No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior, Oxford University Press (1985)