In abstract rewriting, a normal form is an element of the system which cannot be rewritten any further. Stated formally, for some reduction relation ⋅ → ⋅ over X a term t in X is a normal form if there does not exist a term t′ in X such that t → t′.
Consider the basic term rewriting system with reduction rule ρ : g(x, y) → x. The term g(g(4, 2), g(3, 1)) has the following reduction sequence, according to the usual outermost strategy, that is, if the reduction rule is applied to each outermost occurrence of g:
There is no rule that permits us to rewrite 4, so 4 is a normal form for this term rewriting system.
Related concepts refer to the possibility of rewriting an element into normal form. Weak normalization means that some element can be rewritten into a normal form. Strong normalization means that any reduction sequence starting from some element terminates. We say that the system is weakly normalizing (or strongly normalizing) if all elements are weakly normalizing (resp. strongly normalizing).
Newman's lemma states that if an abstract reduction system A is strongly normalizing and is weakly confluent, then A is in fact confluent. The result enables us to further generalize the critical pair lemma.
Famous quotes containing the words normal and/or form:
“Everyone in the full enjoyment of all the blessings of his life, in his normal condition, feels some individual responsibility for the poverty of others. When the sympathies are not blunted by any false philosophy, one feels reproached by one’s own abundance.”
—Elizabeth Cady Stanton (1815–1902)
“An uprising would punish only the country, and that is out of the question. But there is yet another approach, the most effective form of resistance: contemptuous compliance.”
—Franz Grillparzer (1791–1872)