New Zealand Family Rights Protection Party

The New Zealand Family Rights Protection Party was a political party in New Zealand. It was primarily based around Pacific Islanders, and claims that the established political parties do not give sufficient consideration to the concerns of Pacific Islanders in New Zealand.

The party was approved for official registration on 7 March 2005. It contested the 2005 elections and garnered 0.05% of the vote, with the aim of a more serious attempt in the 2008 elections. It was reported to have reached an informal agreement with the Maori Party not to compete against each other. The Labour Party, which has traditionally received substantial support from Pacific Islanders, has dismissed the new party's chances.

In 2007, the party requested and received deregistration.

Historic political parties in New Zealand
  • 99 MP
  • Advance
  • Animals First
  • Asia Pacific United
  • Bill and Ben
  • Christian Coalition
  • Christian Democrats
  • Christian Heritage
  • Communists
  • Conservative
  • Co-operative
  • Country
  • Democrat
  • Democratic Labour
  • Destiny
  • Direct Democracy Party
  • Equal Values
  • Ethnic Minority
  • The Family Party
  • Family Rights Protection Party
  • Freedom Movement
  • Freedom Party
  • Future NZ (i)
  • Future NZ (ii)
  • Green Society
  • Imperial British Conservative
  • Independent Political Labour League
  • Labour (1910)
  • Kiwi
  • Liberal (i)
  • Liberal (ii)
  • Liberal (iii)
  • Liberal (iv)
  • Mana Māori
  • Mana Motuhake
  • Mana Wahine
  • Mauri Pacific
  • McGillicuddy Serious
  • National Front
  • National Socialist
  • Natural Law
  • NewLabour
  • New Citizen
  • New Democrats
  • New Liberal Party
  • New World Order
  • New Zealand Pacific Party
  • New Zealand Party
  • NMP
  • No Commercial Airport at Whenuapai
  • One NZ
  • Outdoor Recreation
  • People's Choice
  • People's Movement
  • Phoenix
  • Piri Wiri Tua
  • Progressive
  • Progressive Greens
  • Radical Party
  • Real Democracy
  • Reform
  • Reform New Zealand
  • Representative
  • Republican (i)
  • Republican (ii)
  • Republic of New Zealand Party
  • Residents Action Movement
  • Social Credit
  • Social Democrats
  • Socialists (i)
  • Socialists (ii)
  • Socialist Unity
  • South Island
  • Superannuitants and Youth
  • Te Tawharau
  • United NZ
  • United Labour
  • United (i)
  • United (ii)
  • Values Party
  • WIN Party
  • Women's Independence
  • World Socialists
  • Young New Zealand

Famous quotes containing the words zealand, family, rights, protection and/or party:

    “Teasing is universal. Anthropologists have found the same fundamental patterns of teasing among New Zealand aborigine children and inner-city kids on the playgrounds of Philadelphia.”
    —Lawrence Kutner (20th century)

    “One theme links together these new proposals for family policy—the idea that the family is exceedingly durable. Changes in structure and function and individual roles are not to be confused with the collapse of the family. Families remain more important in the lives of children than other institutions. Family ties are stronger and more vital than many of us imagine in the perennial atmosphere of crisis surrounding the subject.”
    —Joseph Featherstone (20th century)

    “My dream is that as the years go by and the world knows more and more of America, it ... will turn to America for those moral inspirations that lie at the basis of all freedom ... that America will come into the full light of the day when all shall know that she puts human rights above all other rights, and that her flag is the flag not only of America but of humanity.”
    —Woodrow Wilson (1856–1924)

    “Guns have metamorphosed into cameras in this earnest comedy, the ecology safari, because nature has ceased to be what it always had been—what people needed protection from. Now nature tamed, endangered, mortal—needs to be protected from people.”
    —Susan Sontag (b. 1933)

    “It is a well-settled principle of the international code that where one nation owes another a liquidated debt which it refuses or neglects to pay the aggrieved party may seize on the property belonging to the other, its citizens or subjects, sufficient to pay the debt without giving just cause of war.”
    —Andrew Jackson (1767–1845)