U.S. Supreme Court Case
In February, 2006, a United States District Court judge in Brooklyn declared that the judicial-convention method, of nominating New York Supreme Court justices, was contrary to the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Judge John Gleeson stated: "A state may decide whether or not voters will be the best choosers of judges. But it may not say one thing – 'The justices of the supreme court shall be chosen by the electors,' N.Y. Const. art. VI § 6(c) – and do quite another, as they have here by effectively transferring the power to choose to major party leaders. Put simply ... the state may not pass off the will of the party leaders as the will of the people. Because that is exactly what the New York judicial convention system does, it violates the First Amendment."
In late August, 2006, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit unanimously affirmed Judge Gleeson’s ruling, which mandated open primaries until the state legislature builds a new system. There was a stay, however, so the judicial-convention method was used for the 2006 election.
On February 20, 2007, the Supreme Court of the United States granted a petition for certiorari. The appeal was argued on October 3, 2007.
In the unanimous opinion handed down on January 16, 2008, N.Y. State Bd. of Elections v. Lopez Torres, written by Associate Justice Antonin Scalia, the U.S. Supreme Court found the judicial-convention method constitutional. Nonetheless, Associate Justices Stevens and Kennedy expressed their dislike of the system.
Read more about this topic: New York Supreme Court
Famous quotes containing the words supreme, court and/or case:
“It was the supreme expression of the mediocrity of the apparatus that Stalin himself rose to his position.”
—Leon Trotsky (1879–1940)
“Rome, like Washington, is small enough, quiet enough, for strong personal intimacies; Rome, like Washington, has its democratic court and its entourage of diplomatic circle; Rome, like Washington, gives you plenty of time and plenty of sunlight. In New York we have annihilated both.”
—M. E. W. Sherwood (1826–1903)
“I often used to think myself in the case of the fox-hunter, who, when he had toiled and sweated all day in the chase as if some unheard-of blessing was to crown his success, finds at last all he has got by his labor is a stinking nauseous animal. But my condition was yet worse than his; for he leaves the loathsome wretch to be torn by his hounds, whilst I was obliged to fondle mine, and meanly pretend him to be the object of my love.”
—Sarah Fielding (1710–1768)