Moment-generating Function - Definition

Definition

In probability theory and statistics, the moment-generating function of a random variable X is

wherever this expectation exists.

always exists and is equal to 1.

A key problem with moment-generating functions is that moments and the moment-generating function may not exist, as the integrals need not converge absolutely. By contrast, the characteristic function always exists (because it is the integral of a bounded function on a space of finite measure), and thus may be used instead.

More generally, where T, an n-dimensional random vector, one uses instead of tX:

The reason for defining this function is that it can be used to find all the moments of the distribution. The series expansion of etX is:


e^{tX} = 1 + tX + \frac{t^2X^2}{2!} + \frac{t^3X^3}{3!} + \cdots +\frac{t^nX^n}{n!} + \cdots.

Hence:


M_X(t) = E(e^{tX}) = 1 + tm_1 + \frac{t^2m_2}{2!} + \frac{t^3m_3}{3!}+\cdots + \frac{t^nm_n}{n!}+\cdots,

where mn is the nth moment.

If we differentiate MX(t) i times with respect to t and then set t = 0 we shall therefore obtain the ith moment about the origin, mi.

Read more about this topic:  Moment-generating Function

Famous quotes containing the word definition:

    It is very hard to give a just definition of love. The most we can say of it is this: that in the soul, it is a desire to rule; in the spirit, it is a sympathy; and in the body, it is but a hidden and subtle desire to possess—after many mysteries—what one loves.
    François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld (1613–1680)

    Was man made stupid to see his own stupidity?
    Is God by definition indifferent, beyond us all?
    Is the eternal truth man’s fighting soul
    Wherein the Beast ravens in its own avidity?
    Richard Eberhart (b. 1904)

    The physicians say, they are not materialists; but they are:MSpirit is matter reduced to an extreme thinness: O so thin!—But the definition of spiritual should be, that which is its own evidence. What notions do they attach to love! what to religion! One would not willingly pronounce these words in their hearing, and give them the occasion to profane them.
    Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)