Advantages
The molten salt reactor offers many potential advantages:
- Inherently safe design (safety by passive components and the strong negative temperature coefficient of reactivity).
- Using an abundant supply of thorium to breed uranium-233 fuel.
- Much cleaner: as a full recycle system, the discharge wastes from the reactor are predominately fission products, most of which have relatively short half lives compared to longer-lived actinide wastes. This can result in a significant reduction in the containment period in a geologic repository (300 years vs. tens of thousands of years).
- The fuel's liquid phase not only allows for fission products to be separated easily from the fuel, but also from each other, which allows for some of the potentially useful fission products to be collected and sold.
- There is no need for precise fuel rod manufacturing
- Since the reactor operates at atmospheric pressure, there is no need for a pressure vessel
- Can "burn" some problematic radioactive waste (with transuranic elements from traditional solid-fuel nuclear reactors).
- Possible even in small, even 2–8 MWth or 1–3 MWe. Submarine or aircraft size is possible.
- Can react to load changes in less than 60 seconds (unlike "traditional" solid-fuel nuclear power plants).
Read more about this topic: Molten Salt Reactor
Famous quotes containing the word advantages:
“Can you conceive what it is to native-born American women citizens, accustomed to the advantages of our schools, our churches and the mingling of our social life, to ask over and over again for so simple a thing as that “we, the people,” should mean women as well as men; that our Constitution should mean exactly what it says?”
—Mary F. Eastman, U.S. suffragist. As quoted in History of Woman Suffrage, vol. 4 ch. 5, by Susan B. Anthony and Ida Husted Harper (1902)
“[T]here is no Part of the World where Servants have those Privileges and Advantages as in England: They have no where else such plentiful Diet, large Wages, or indulgent Liberty: There is no place wherein they labour less, and yet where they are so little respectful, more wasteful, more negligent, or where they so frequently change their Masters.”
—Richard Steele (1672–1729)
“... is it not clear that to give to such women as desire it and can devote themselves to literary and scientific pursuits all the advantages enjoyed by men of the same class will lessen essentially the number of thoughtless, idle, vain and frivolous women and thus secure the [sic] society the services of those who now hang as dead weight?”
—Sarah M. Grimke (1792–1873)