Manhattan Project - Cost

Cost

Manhattan Project costs through 31 December 1945
Site Cost (1945 USD) Cost (2012 USD)
Oak Ridge $1,188,352,000 $15.3 billion
Hanford $390,124,000 $5.04 billion
Special operating materials $103,369,000 $1.33 billion
Los Alamos $74,055,000 $956 million
Research and development $69,681,000 $900 million
Government overhead $37,255,000 $481 million
Heavy water plants $26,768,000 $346 million
Total $1,889,604,000 $24.4 billion

The project expenditure through 1 October 1945 was $1.845 billion, equivalent to less than nine days of wartime spending, and was $2.191 billion when the AEC assumed control on 1 January 1947. Total allocation was $2.4 billion. Over 90% of the cost was for building plants and producing the fissionable materials, and less than 10% for development and production of the weapons.

A total of four weapons (the Trinity gadget, Little Boy, Fat Man, and an unused bomb) were produced by the end of 1945, making the average cost per bomb around $500 million in 1945 dollars. By comparison, the project's total cost by the end of 1945 was about 90% of the total spent on the production of US small arms (not including ammunition) and 34% of the total spent on US tanks during the same period.

Read more about this topic:  Manhattan Project

Famous quotes containing the word cost:

    “In the early days of the world, the Almighty said to the first of our race “In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread”; and since then, if we except the light and the air of heaven, no good thing has been, or can be enjoyed by us, without having first cost labour.”
    —Abraham Lincoln (1809–1865)

    “History is strewn with the wrecks of nations which have gained a little progressiveness at the cost of a great deal of hard manliness, and have thus prepared themselves for destruction as soon as the the movements of the world gave a chance for it.”
    —Walter Bagehot (1826–1877)

    “Each is under the most sacred obligation not to squander the material committed to him, not to sap his strength in folly and vice, and to see at the least that he delivers a product worthy the labor and cost which have been expended on him.”
    —Anna Julia Cooper (1859–1964)