Covering Groups
In a previous section we constructed a homomorphism SL(2,C) SO+(1,3), which we called the spinor map. Since SL(2,C) is simply connected, it is the covering group of the restricted Lorentz group SO+(1,3). By restriction we obtain a homomorphism SU(2) SO(3). Here, the special unitary group SU(2), which is isomorphic to the group of unit norm quaternions, is also simply connected, so it is the covering group of the rotation group SO(3). Each of these covering maps are twofold covers in the sense that precisely two elements of the covering group map to each element of the quotient. One often says that the restricted Lorentz group and the rotation group are doubly connected. This means that the fundamental group of the each group is isomorphic to the two element cyclic group Z2.
Warning: in applications to quantum mechanics the special linear group SL(2, C) is sometimes called the Lorentz group.
Twofold coverings are characteristic of spin groups. Indeed, in addition to the double coverings
- Spin+(1,3)=SL(2,C) SO+(1,3)
- Spin(3)=SU(2) SO(3)
we have the double coverings
- Pin(1,3) O(1,3)
- Spin(1,3) SO(1,3)
- Spin+(1,2) = SU(1,1) SO(1,2)
These spinorial double coverings are all closely related to Clifford algebras.
Read more about this topic: Lorentz Group
Famous quotes containing the words covering and/or groups:
“We have good reason to believe that memories of early childhood do not persist in consciousness because of the absence or fragmentary character of language covering this period. Words serve as fixatives for mental images. . . . Even at the end of the second year of life when word tags exist for a number of objects in the child’s life, these words are discrete and do not yet bind together the parts of an experience or organize them in a way that can produce a coherent memory.”
—Selma H. Fraiberg (20th century)
“... until both employers’ and workers’ groups assume responsibility for chastising their own recalcitrant children, they can vainly bay the moon about “ignorant” and “unfair” public criticism. Moreover, their failure to impose voluntarily upon their own groups codes of decency and honor will result in more and more necessity for government control.”
—Mary Barnett Gilson (1877–?)