List Of Programming Languages By Type
This is a list of programming languages grouped by type. Some languages qualify as multiple types.
Read more about List Of Programming Languages By Type: Array Language, Aspect-oriented Languages, Assembly Languages, Authoring Languages, Command Line Interface Languages, Compiled Languages, Concurrent Languages, Curly-bracket Languages, Dataflow Languages, Data-oriented Languages, Data-structured Languages, Declarative Languages, Esoteric Languages, Extension Languages, Fourth-generation Languages, Functional Languages, Imperative Languages, Interactive Mode Languages, Interpreted Languages, Iterative Languages, List-based Languages – LISPs, Little Languages, Logic-based Languages, Machine Languages, Metaprogramming Languages, Multiparadigm Languages, Numerical Analysis, Non-English-based Languages, Object-oriented Class-based Languages, Object-oriented Prototype-based Languages, Off-side Rule Languages, Procedural Languages, Reflective Languages, Rule-based Languages, Scripting Languages, Stack-based Languages, Synchronous Languages, Syntax Handling Languages, Visual Languages, Wirth Languages, XML-based Languages
Famous quotes containing the words list of, list, programming, languages and/or type:
“Feminism is an entire world view or gestalt, not just a laundry list of women’s issues.”
—Charlotte Bunch (b. 1944)
“All is possible,
Who so list believe;
Trust therefore first, and after preve,
As men wed ladies by license and leave,
All is possible.”
—Sir Thomas Wyatt (1503?–1542)
“If there is a price to pay for the privilege of spending the early years of child rearing in the driver’s seat, it is our reluctance, our inability, to tolerate being demoted to the backseat. Spurred by our success in programming our children during the preschool years, we may find it difficult to forgo in later states the level of control that once afforded us so much satisfaction.”
—Melinda M. Marshall (20th century)
“I am always sorry when any language is lost, because languages are the pedigree of nations.”
—Samuel Johnson (1709–1784)
““... In truth I find it ridiculous that a man of his intelligence suffer over this type of person, who is not even interesting, for she is said to be foolish”, she added with all the wisdom of people who are not in love, who find that a sensible man should only be unhappy over a person who is worthwhile; it is almost tantamount to being surprised that anyone deign having cholera for having been infected with a creature as small as the vibrio bacilla.”
—Marcel Proust (1871–1922)