This is intended as a non-exhaustive list of input methods for UNIX platforms. An input method is a means of entering characters and glyphs that have a corresponding encoding in a Character set. See the input method page for more information.
Name | Languages supported | XIM | Qt4 | GTK+ 2 | GTK+ 3 | Other |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBus | Multiple languages, including CJK | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
SCIM | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
uim | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Leim, TTY and TSM (Mac OS X) | |
GCIN | Chinese input method server for Big5 Traditional Chinese character sets, expandible with input methods e.g. from SCIM. | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
xcin | Mainly for traditional Chinese; adapted for use for simplified Chinese. | ✓ | ||||
oxim | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
fcitx | Mainly for Simplified Chinese | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | fbterm |
InputKing | Chinese (traditional Chinese and simplified Chinese), Japanese and Korean. | Browser based | ||||
im-ja | Japanese | ✓ | ✓ | |||
kinput2 | ✓ | kinput2 protocol | ||||
Nunome | Qtopia | |||||
ATOKX | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
ami | Korean | ✓ | ||||
imhangul | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
Nabi | ✓ | |||||
qimhangul | ✓ | |||||
xvnkb | Vietnamese | ✓ | ||||
x-unikey | ✓ |
Famous quotes containing the words list of, list, input, methods and/or platforms:
“Modern tourist guides have helped raised tourist expectations. And they have provided the nativesfrom Kaiser Wilhelm down to the villagers of Chichacestenangowith a detailed and itemized list of what is expected of them and when. These are the up-to- date scripts for actors on the tourists stage.”
—Daniel J. Boorstin (b. 1914)
“Modern tourist guides have helped raised tourist expectations. And they have provided the nativesfrom Kaiser Wilhelm down to the villagers of Chichacestenangowith a detailed and itemized list of what is expected of them and when. These are the up-to- date scripts for actors on the tourists stage.”
—Daniel J. Boorstin (b. 1914)
“Family life is not a computer program that runs on its own; it needs continual input from everyone.”
—Neil Kurshan (20th century)
“The comparison between Coleridge and Johnson is obvious in so far as each held sway chiefly by the power of his tongue. The difference between their methods is so marked that it is tempting, but also unnecessary, to judge one to be inferior to the other. Johnson was robust, combative, and concrete; Coleridge was the opposite. The contrast was perhaps in his mind when he said of Johnson: his bow-wow manner must have had a good deal to do with the effect produced.”
—Virginia Woolf (18821941)
“I would rather be known as an advocate of equal suffrage than to speak every night on the best-paying platforms in the United States and ignore it.”
—Anna Howard Shaw (18471919)