Connection Between The Two Definitions
An order-theoretic lattice gives rise to the two binary operations and . Since the commutative, associative and absorption laws can easily be verified for these operations, they make (L, ) into a lattice in the algebraic sense.
The converse is also true. Given an algebraically defined lattice (L, ), one can define a partial order ≤ on L by setting
- a ≤ b if and only if a = ab, or
- a ≤ b if and only if b = ab,
for all elements a and b from L. The laws of absorption ensure that both definitions are equivalent. One can now check that the relation ≤ introduced in this way defines a partial ordering within which binary meets and joins are given through the original operations and .
Since the two definitions of a lattice are equivalent, one may freely invoke aspects of either definition in any way that suits the purpose at hand.
Read more about this topic: Lattice (order)
Famous quotes containing the words connection between the, connection between, connection and/or definitions:
“Parents have railed against shelters near schools, but no one has made any connection between the crazed consumerism of our kids and their elders cold unconcern toward others. Maybe the homeless are not the only ones who need to spend time in these places to thaw out.”
—Anna Quindlen (b. 1952)
“Much is made of the accelerating brutality of young peoples crimes, but rarely does our concern for dangerous children translate into concern for children in danger. We fail to make the connection between the use of force on children themselves, and violent antisocial behavior, or the connection between watching father batter mother and the child deducing a link between violence and masculinity.”
—Letty Cottin Pogrebin (20th century)
“Children of the same family, the same blood, with the same first associations and habits, have some means of enjoyment in their power, which no subsequent connections can supply; and it must be by a long and unnatural estrangement, by a divorce which no subsequent connection can justify, if such precious remains of the earliest attachments are ever entirely outlived.”
—Jane Austen (17751817)
“Lord Byron is an exceedingly interesting person, and as such is it not to be regretted that he is a slave to the vilest and most vulgar prejudices, and as mad as the winds?
There have been many definitions of beauty in art. What is it? Beauty is what the untrained eyes consider abominable.”
—Edmond De Goncourt (18221896)