Specification of The Knowledge Gap Hypothesis
Based on observations implicit in mass communication research, Tichenor, Donohue, and Olien (1970) define the knowledge gap hypothesis as follows:
- “As the infusion of mass media information into a social system increases, higher socioeconomic status segments tend to acquire this information faster than lower socioeconomic-status population segments so that the gap in knowledge between the two tends to increase rather than decrease” (Tichenor, Donohue, and Olien 1970, pp. 159-160).
Additionally, Tichenor, Donohue, and Olien suggest 5 reasons why the knowledge gap should exist :
- Communication skills - higher status people generally have more education, which improves their reading, comprehension, and memory skills;
- Stored information - higher status people are more likely to already know of topics in the news through pervious media exposure or through formal education;
- Relevant social contact - higher status people generally have a broader sphere of activity, greater number of reference groups, and interpersonal contacts and are thus more likely to discuss news topics with others;
- Selective exposure - lower status people may be less interested, and therefore less likely to expose themselves to certain news topics; and
- Media target markets - media outlets tailor their content to the tastes and interests of their audience.
Read more about this topic: Knowledge Gap Hypothesis
Famous quotes containing the words knowledge, gap and/or hypothesis:
“Mathematics is merely the means to a general and ultimate knowledge of man.”
—Friedrich Nietzsche (18441900)
“So while it is true that children are exposed to more information and a greater variety of experiences than were children of the past, it does not follow that they automatically become more sophisticated. We always know much more than we understand, and with the torrent of information to which young people are exposed, the gap between knowing and understanding, between experience and learning, has become even greater than it was in the past.”
—David Elkind (20th century)
“It is more than likely that the brain itself is, in origin and development, only a sort of great clot of genital fluid held in suspense or reserved.... This hypothesis ... would explain the enormous content of the brain as a maker or presenter of images.”
—Ezra Pound (18851972)