Proof
We first have to show that the ascending Kleene chain of f exists in L. To show that, we prove the following lemma:
- Lemma 1:If L is CPO, and f : L → L is a Scott-continuous, then
Proof by induction:
- Assume n = 0. Then, since ⊥ is the least element.
- Assume n > 0. Then we have to show that . By rearranging we get . By inductive assumption, we know that holds, and because f is monotone (property of Scott-continuous functions), the result holds as well.
Immediate corollary of Lemma 1 is the existence of the chain.
Let M be the set of all elements of the chain: . This set is clearly directed. From definition of CPO follows that this set has a supremum, we will call it m. What remains now is to show that m is the fixpoint. that is, we have to show that f(m) = m. Because f is continuous, f(sup(M)) = sup(f(M)), that is f(m) = sup(f(M)). But sup(f(M)) = sup(M) (from the property of the chain) and from that f(m) = m, making m a fixpoint.
The proof that m is the least fixpoint can be done by contradiction. Assume k is a fixpoint and k < m. Than there has to be i such that . But than for all j > i the result would never be greater than k and so m cannot be a supremum of M, which is a contradiction.
Read more about this topic: Kleene Fixed-point Theorem
Famous quotes containing the word proof:
“a meek humble Man of modest sense,
Who preaching peace does practice continence;
Whose pious lifes a proof he does believe,
Mysterious truths, which no Man can conceive.”
—John Wilmot, 2d Earl Of Rochester (16471680)
“It comes to pass oft that a terrible oath, with a swaggering accent sharply twanged off, gives manhood more approbation than ever proof itself would have earned him.”
—William Shakespeare (15641616)
“There are some persons in this world, who, unable to give better proof of being wise, take a strange delight in showing what they think they have sagaciously read in mankind by uncharitable suspicions of them.”
—Herman Melville (18191891)