Kepler Problem - Solution of The Kepler Problem

Solution of The Kepler Problem

The equation of motion for the radius of a particle of mass moving in a central potential is given by Lagrange's equations


m\frac{d^{2}r}{dt^{2}} - mr \omega^{2} =
m\frac{d^{2}r}{dt^{2}} - \frac{L^{2}}{mr^{3}} = -\frac{dV}{dr}


and the angular momentum is conserved. For illustration, the first term on the left-hand side is zero for circular orbits, and the applied inwards force equals the centripetal force requirement, as expected.

If L is not zero the definition of angular momentum allows a change of independent variable from to


\frac{d}{dt} = \frac{L}{mr^{2}} \frac{d}{d\theta}

giving the new equation of motion that is independent of time


\frac{L}{r^{2}} \frac{d}{d\theta} \left( \frac{L}{mr^{2}} \frac{dr}{d\theta} \right)- \frac{L^{2}}{mr^{3}} = -\frac{dV}{dr}

The expansion of the first term is

\frac{L}{r^{2}} \frac{d}{d\theta} \left( \frac{L}{mr^{2}} \frac{dr}{d\theta} \right) = \frac{L^{2}}{mr^{5}} \left( \frac{dr}{d\theta} \right)^2 - \frac{L^{2}}{mr^{4}} \frac{d^{2}r}{d\theta^{2}}


This equation becomes quasilinear on making the change of variables and multiplying both sides by


\frac{du}{d\theta} = \frac{-1}{r^{2}} \frac{dr}{d\theta}

\frac{d^{2}u}{d^{2}\theta^{2}} = \frac{2}{r^{3}} \left( \frac{dr}{d\theta} \right)^{2} - \frac{1}{r^{2}} \frac{d^{2}r}{d\theta^{2}}

After substitution and rearrangement:


\frac{d^{2}u}{d\theta^{2}} + u = -\frac{m}{L^{2}} \frac{d}{du} V(1/u)

For an inverse-square force law such as the gravitational or electrostatic potential, the potential can be written


V(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{k}{r} = ku

The orbit can be derived from the general equation


\frac{d^{2}u}{d\theta^{2}} + u = -\frac{m}{L^{2}} \frac{d}{du} V(1/u) = -\frac{km}{L^{2}}

whose solution is the constant plus a simple sinusoid


u \equiv \frac{1}{r} = -\frac{km}{L^{2}} \left

where (the eccentricity) and (the phase offset) are constants of integration.

This is the general formula for a conic section that has one focus at the origin; corresponds to a circle, corresponds to an ellipse, corresponds to a parabola, and corresponds to a hyperbola. The eccentricity is related to the total energy (cf. the Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector)


e = \sqrt{1 + \frac{2EL^{2}}{k^{2}m}}

Comparing these formulae shows that corresponds to an ellipse (all solutions which are closed orbits are ellipses), corresponds to a parabola, and corresponds to a hyperbola. In particular, for perfectly circular orbits (the central force exactly equals the centripetal force requirement, which determines the required angular velocity for a given circular radius).

For a repulsive force (k > 0) only e > 1 applies.

Read more about this topic:  Kepler Problem

Famous quotes containing the words solution of the, solution of, solution and/or problem:

    The truth of the thoughts that are here set forth seems to me unassailable and definitive. I therefore believe myself to have found, on all essential points, the final solution of the problems. And if I am not mistaken in this belief, then the second thing in which the value of this work consists is that it shows how little is achieved when these problems are solved.
    Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951)

    I herewith commission you to carry out all preparations with regard to ... a total solution of the Jewish question in those territories of Europe which are under German influence.... I furthermore charge you to submit to me as soon as possible a draft showing the ... measures already taken for the execution of the intended final solution of the Jewish question.
    Hermann Goering (1893–1946)

    The Settlement ... is an experimental effort to aid in the solution of the social and industrial problems which are engendered by the modern conditions of life in a great city. It insists that these problems are not confined to any one portion of the city. It is an attempt to relieve, at the same time, the overaccumulation at one end of society and the destitution at the other ...
    Jane Addams (1860–1935)

    And just as there are no words for the surface, that is,
    No words to say what it really is, that it is not
    Superficial but a visible core, then there is
    No way out of the problem of pathos vs. experience.
    John Ashbery (b. 1927)