John B. Mc Diarmid - Works

Works

McDiarmid’s published works include:

  • “Theophrastus on the Eternity of the World”. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 71 (1940): 239–47.
  • “Note on Heraclitus Fragment 124”. American Journal of Philology 62 (October 1941):492–94.
  • “Euripides’ Ion 1561”. American Journal of Philology 68 (January 1947): 86-87.
  • “Theophrastus on the Presocratic Causes.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 61 (1953): 85-156.
  • “Biographical Tradition of the Presocratics”. In mimeograph to the membership of the Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy for their 1955 annual meeting, at which the paper was presented and discussed.
  • “Phantom Words in Democritean Terminology”. Hermes 86 (November 1958): 291–98.
  • “Theophrastus,” De Sensibus 66, Democritus’ Explanation of Salimity”. American Journal of Philology 80 (January 1959):56-66..
  • “Plato and Theophrastus’ De Sensibus”. Phronesis 4 (1959): 59-70.
  • “Theophrastus De Sensibus 61-62: Democratus’ Theory of Weight.” Classical Philology 55 (January 1960): 28-30.
  • “The Manuscript Tradition of Theophrastus’ De Sensibus”. Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie 44, no. 1 (1962):1-32.
  • “Theophrastus on the Presocratic Causes.” In Studies in Presocratic Philosophy, vol I: The Beginnings of Philosophy, .pp. 178–238. International Library of Philosophy and Scientific Method. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. New York, The Humanities Press, 1970.

Read more about this topic:  John B. Mc Diarmid

Famous quotes containing the word works:

    “His character as one of the fathers of the English language would alone make his works important, even those which have little poetical merit. He was as simple as Wordsworth in preferring his homely but vigorous Saxon tongue, when it was neglected by the court, and had not yet attained to the dignity of a literature, and rendered a similar service to his country to that which Dante rendered to Italy.”
    —Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    “Most young black females learn to be suspicious and critical of feminist thinking long before they have any clear understanding of its theory and politics.... Without rigorously engaging feminist thought, they insist that racial separatism works best. This attitude is dangerous. It not only erases the reality of common female experience as a basis for academic study; it also constructs a framework in which differences cannot be examined comparatively.”
    —bell hooks (b. c. 1955)

    “The subterranean miner that works in us all, how can one tell whither leads his shaft by the ever shifting, muffled sound of his pick?”
    —Herman Melville (1819–1891)