Definition
Suppose given a sheaf on Y and that we want to transport to X using a continuous map f : X → Y. We will call the result the inverse image or pullback sheaf . If we try to imitate the direct image by setting for each open set U of X, we immediately run into a problem: f(U) is not necessarily open. The best we can do is to approximate it by open sets, and even then we will get a presheaf, not a sheaf. Consequently we define to be the sheaf associated to the presheaf:
(U is an open subset of X and the colimit runs over all open subsets V of Y containing f(U)).
For example, if f is just the inclusion of a point y of Y, then is just the stalk of at this point.
The restriction maps, as well as the functoriality of the inverse image follows from the universal property of direct limits.
When dealing with morphisms f : X → Y of locally ringed spaces, for example schemes in algebraic geometry, one often works with sheaves of -modules, where is the structure sheaf of Y. Then the functor f−1 is inappropriate, because (in general) it does not even give sheaves of -modules. In order to remedy this, one defines in this situation for a sheaf of -modules its inverse image by
- .
Read more about this topic: Inverse Image Functor
Famous quotes containing the word definition:
“No man, not even a doctor, ever gives any other definition of what a nurse should be than this—”devoted and obedient.” This definition would do just as well for a porter. It might even do for a horse. It would not do for a policeman.”
—Florence Nightingale (1820–1910)
“It’s a rare parent who can see his or her child clearly and objectively. At a school board meeting I attended . . . the only definition of a gifted child on which everyone in the audience could agree was “mine.””
—Jane Adams (20th century)
“Although there is no universal agreement as to a definition of life, its biological manifestations are generally considered to be organization, metabolism, growth, irritability, adaptation, and reproduction.”
—The Columbia Encyclopedia, Fifth Edition, the first sentence of the article on “life” (based on wording in the First Edition, 1935)