Inverse Image Functor - Definition

Definition

Suppose given a sheaf on Y and that we want to transport to X using a continuous map f : XY. We will call the result the inverse image or pullback sheaf . If we try to imitate the direct image by setting for each open set U of X, we immediately run into a problem: f(U) is not necessarily open. The best we can do is to approximate it by open sets, and even then we will get a presheaf, not a sheaf. Consequently we define to be the sheaf associated to the presheaf:

(U is an open subset of X and the colimit runs over all open subsets V of Y containing f(U)).

For example, if f is just the inclusion of a point y of Y, then is just the stalk of at this point.

The restriction maps, as well as the functoriality of the inverse image follows from the universal property of direct limits.

When dealing with morphisms f : X → Y of locally ringed spaces, for example schemes in algebraic geometry, one often works with sheaves of -modules, where is the structure sheaf of Y. Then the functor f−1 is inappropriate, because (in general) it does not even give sheaves of -modules. In order to remedy this, one defines in this situation for a sheaf of -modules its inverse image by

.

Read more about this topic:  Inverse Image Functor

Famous quotes containing the word definition:

    The man who knows governments most completely is he who troubles himself least about a definition which shall give their essence. Enjoying an intimate acquaintance with all their particularities in turn, he would naturally regard an abstract conception in which these were unified as a thing more misleading than enlightening.
    William James (1842–1910)

    The definition of good prose is proper words in their proper places; of good verse, the most proper words in their proper places. The propriety is in either case relative. The words in prose ought to express the intended meaning, and no more; if they attract attention to themselves, it is, in general, a fault.
    Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772–1834)

    The very definition of the real becomes: that of which it is possible to give an equivalent reproduction.... The real is not only what can be reproduced, but that which is always already reproduced. The hyperreal.
    Jean Baudrillard (b. 1929)