Size of Intervals Used in Different Tuning Systems
Number of semitones |
Name | 5-limit tuning (pitch ratio) |
Comparison of interval width (in cents) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5-limit tuning | Pythagorean tuning |
1/4-comma meantone |
Equal temperament |
|||
0 | Perfect unison | 1:1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | Minor second | 16:15 | 112 | 90 | 117 | 100 |
2 | Major second | 9:8 10:9 |
204 182 |
204 | 193 | 200 |
3 | Minor third | 6:5 75:64 32:27 |
316 (wolf) 275 294 |
294 318 |
310 (wolf) 269 |
300 |
4 | Major third | 5:4 512:405 32:25 81:64 |
386 406 (wolf) 427 408 |
408 384 |
386 (wolf) 427 |
400 |
5 | Perfect fourth | 4:3 675:512 27:20 |
498 478 520 |
498 (wolf) 522 |
503 (wolf) 462 |
500 |
6 | Augmented fourth Diminished fifth |
45:32 64:45 |
590 610 |
612 588 |
579 621 |
600 |
7 | Perfect fifth | 3:2 40:27 1024:675 |
702 680 722 |
702 (wolf) 678 |
697 (wolf) 738 |
700 |
8 | Minor sixth | 8:5 | 814 | 792 | 814 | 800 |
9 | Major sixth | 5:3 | 884 | 906 | 890 | 900 |
10 | Minor seventh | 9:5 16:9 |
1018 996 |
996 | 1007 | 1000 |
11 | Major seventh | 15:8 | 1088 | 1110 | 1083 | 1100 |
12 | Perfect octave | 2:1 | 1200 | 1200 | 1200 | 1200 |
In this table, the interval widths used in four different tuning systems are compared. To facilitate comparison, just intervals as provided by 5-limit tuning (see symmetric scale n.1) are shown in bold font, and the values in cents are rounded to integers. Notice that in each of the non-equal tuning systems, by definition the width of each type of interval (including the semitone) changes depending on the note from which the interval starts. This is the price paid for seeking just intonation. However, for the sake of simplicity, for some types of interval the table shows only one value (the most often observed one).
In 1/4-comma meantone, by definition 11 perfect fifths have a size of approximately 697 cents (700−ε cents, where ε ≈ 3.42 cents); since the average size of the 12 fifths must equal exactly 700 cents (as in equal temperament), the other one must have a size of about 738 cents (700+11ε, the wolf fifth or diminished sixth); 8 major thirds have size about 386 cents (400−4ε), 4 have size about 427 cents (400+8ε, actually diminished fourths), and their average size is 400 cents. In short, similar differences in width are observed for all interval types, except for unisons and octaves, and they are all multiples of ε (the difference between the 1/4-comma meantone fifth and the average fifth). A more detailed analysis is provided at 1/4-comma meantone#Size of intervals. Note that 1/4-comma meantone was designed to produce just major thirds, but only 8 of them are just (5:4, about 386 cents).
The Pythagorean tuning is characterized by smaller differences because they are multiples of a smaller ε (ε ≈ 1.96 cents, the difference between the Pythagorean fifth and the average fifth). Notice that here the fifth is wider than 700 cents, while in most meantone temperaments, including 1/4-comma meantone, it is tempered to a size smaller than 700. A more detailed analysis is provided at Pythagorean tuning#Size of intervals.
The 5-limit tuning system uses just tones and semitones as building blocks, rather than a stack of perfect fifths, and this leads to even more varied intervals throughout the scale (each kind of interval has three or four different sizes). A more detailed analysis is provided at 5-limit tuning#Size of intervals. Note that 5-limit tuning was designed to maximize the number of just intervals, but even in this system some intervals are not just (e.g., 3 fifths, 5 major thirds and 6 minor thirds are not just; also, 3 major and 3 minor thirds are wolf intervals).
The above mentioned symmetric scale 1, defined in the 5-limit tuning system, is not the only method to obtain just intonation. It is possible to construct juster intervals or just intervals closer to the equal-tempered equivalents, but most of the ones listed above have been used historically in equivalent contexts. In particular, the asymmetric version of the 5-limit tuning scale provides a juster value for the minor seventh (9:5, rather than 16:9). Moreover, the tritone (augmented fourth or diminished fifth), could have other just ratios; for instance, 7:5 (about 583 cents) or 17:12 (about 603 cents) are possible alternatives for the augmented fourth (the latter is fairly common, as it is closer to the equal-tempered value of 600 cents). The 7:4 interval (about 969 cents), also known as the harmonic seventh, has been a contentious issue throughout the history of music theory; it is 31 cents flatter than an equal-tempered minor seventh. Some assert the 7:4 is one of the blue notes used in jazz. For further details about reference ratios, see 5-limit tuning#The justest ratios.
In the diatonic system, every interval has one or more enharmonic equivalents, such as augmented second for minor third.
Read more about this topic: Interval (music)
Famous quotes containing the words size of, size, intervals and/or systems:
“In mathematics he was greater
Than Tycho Brahe, or Erra Pater:
For he, by geometric scale,
Could take the size of pots of ale;
Resolve, by sines and tangents straight,
If bread and butter wanted weight;
And wisely tell what hour o th day
The clock doth strike, by algebra.”
—Samuel Butler (16121680)
“Our brains are no longer conditioned for reverence and awe. We cannot imagine a Second Coming that would not be cut down to size by the televised evening news, or a Last Judgment not subject to pages of holier-than-Thou second- guessing in The New York Review of Books.”
—John Updike (b. 1932)
“Fishermen, hunters, woodchoppers, and others, spending their lives in the fields and woods, in a peculiar sense a part of Nature themselves, are often in a more favorable mood for observing her, in the intervals of their pursuits, than philosophers or poets even, who approach her with expectation. She is not afraid to exhibit herself to them.”
—Henry David Thoreau (18171862)
“No civilization ... would ever have been possible without a framework of stability, to provide the wherein for the flux of change. Foremost among the stabilizing factors, more enduring than customs, manners and traditions, are the legal systems that regulate our life in the world and our daily affairs with each other.”
—Hannah Arendt (19061975)