Hilbert Transform - Relationship With The Fourier Transform

Relationship With The Fourier Transform

The Hilbert transform is a multiplier operator (Duoandikoetxea 2000, Chapter 3). The symbol of H is σH(ω) = −i sgn(ω) where sgn is the signum function. Therefore:


\mathcal{F}(H(u))(\omega) = (-i\,\operatorname{sgn}(\omega))\cdot \mathcal{F}(u)(\omega)\,

where denotes the Fourier transform. Since sgn(x) = sgn(2πx), it follows that this result applies to the three common definitions of

By Euler's formula,

 \sigma_H(\omega) \, \ =\ \begin{cases}
\ \ i = e^{+i\pi/2}, & \mbox{for } \omega < 0\\
\ \ \ \ 0, & \mbox{for } \omega = 0\\
\ \ -i = e^{-i\pi/2}, & \mbox{for } \omega > 0.
\end{cases}

Therefore H(u)(t) has the effect of shifting the phase of the negative frequency components of u(t) by +90° (π/2 radians) and the phase of the positive frequency components by −90°. And i·H(u)(t) has the effect of restoring the positive frequency components while shifting the negative frequency ones an additional +90°, resulting in their negation.

When the Hilbert transform is applied twice, the phase of the negative and positive frequency components of u(t) are respectively shifted by +180° and −180°, which are equivalent amounts. The signal is negated, i.e., H(H(u)) = −u, because:

Read more about this topic:  Hilbert Transform

Famous quotes containing the words relationship with, relationship and/or transform:

    Henry David Thoreau, who never earned much of a living or sustained a relationship with any woman that wasn’t brotherly—who lived mostly under his parents’ roof ... who advocated one day’s work and six days “off” as the weekly round and was considered a bit of a fool in his hometown ... is probably the American writer who tells us best how to live comfortably with our most constant companion, ourselves.
    Edward Hoagland (b. 1932)

    If one could be friendly with women, what a pleasure—the relationship so secret and private compared with relations with men. Why not write about it truthfully?
    Virginia Woolf (1882–1941)

    But I must needs take my petulance, contrasting it with my accustomed morning hopefulness, as a sign of the ageing of appetite, of a decay in the very capacity of enjoyment. We need some imaginative stimulus, some not impossible ideal which may shape vague hope, and transform it into effective desire, to carry us year after year, without disgust, through the routine- work which is so large a part of life.
    Walter Pater (1839–1894)