Group Rings Over An Infinite Group
Much less is known in the case where G is countably infinite, or uncountable, and this is an area of active research. The case where R is the field of complex numbers is probably the one best studied. In this case, Irving Kaplansky proved that if a and b are elements of C with ab = 1, then ba = 1. Whether this is true if R is a field of positive characteristic remains unknown.
A long-standing conjecture of Kaplansky (~1940) says that if G is a torsion-free group, and K is a field, then the group ring K has no non-trivial zero divisors. This conjecture is equivalent to K having no non-trivial nilpotents under the same hypotheses for K and G.
In fact, the condition that K is a field can be relaxed to any ring that can be embedded into an integral domain.
The conjecture remains open in full generality, however some special cases of torsion-free groups have been shown to satisfy the zero divisor conjecture. These include:
- Unique product groups (which include virtually abelian groups, orderable groups, and free groups, since they are orderable)
- Elementary amenable groups
- Diffuse groups - in particular, groups that act freely isometrically on R-trees, and the fundamental groups of surface groups except for the fundamental groups of direct sums of one, two or three copies of the projective plane.
The case of G being a topological group is discussed in greater detail in the article on group algebras.
Read more about this topic: Group Ring
Famous quotes containing the words group, rings and/or infinite:
“The government of the United States at present is a foster-child of the special interests. It is not allowed to have a voice of its own. It is told at every move, Dont do that, You will interfere with our prosperity. And when we ask: where is our prosperity lodged? a certain group of gentlemen say, With us.”
—Woodrow Wilson (18561924)
“We will have rings and things, and fine array,
And kiss me, Kate, we will be married o Sunday.”
—William Shakespeare (15641616)
“In a symbol there is concealment and yet revelation: here therefore, by silence and by speech acting together, comes a double significance.... In the symbol proper, what we can call a symbol, there is ever, more or less distinctly and directly, some embodiment and revelation of the Infinite; the Infinite is made to blend itself with the Finite, to stand visible, and as it were, attainable there. By symbols, accordingly, is man guided and commanded, made happy, made wretched.”
—Thomas Carlyle (17951881)