Group Action - Definition

Definition

If G is a group and X is a set, then a (left) group action of G on X is a binary operator:

that satisfies the following two axioms:

Associativity
(gh).x = g.(h.x) for all g, h in G and all x in X. (Here, gh denotes the result of applying the group operation of G to the elements g and h.)
Identity
e.x = x for all x in X. (Here, e denotes the neutral element of the group G.)

The set X is called a (left) G-set. The group G is said to act on X (on the left).

From these two axioms, it follows that for every g in G, the function which maps x in X to g.x is a bijective map from X to X (its inverse being the function which maps x to g−1.x). Therefore, one may alternatively define a group action of G on X as a group homomorphism from G into the symmetric group Sym(X) of all bijections from X to X.

In complete analogy, one can define a right group action of G on X as an operation X × GX mapping (x,g) to x.g and satisfying the two axioms:

Associativity
x.(gh) = (x.g).h for all g, h in G and all x in X;
Identity
x.e = x for all x in X.

The difference between left and right actions is in the order in which a product like gh acts on x. For a left action h acts first and is followed by g, while for a right action g acts first and is followed by h. Because of the formula (gh)−1=h−1g−1, one can construct a left action from a right action by composing with the inverse operation of the group. Also, a right action of a group G on X is the same thing as a left action of its opposite group Gop on X. It is thus sufficient to only consider left actions without any loss of generality.

Read more about this topic:  Group Action

Famous quotes containing the word definition:

    The very definition of the real becomes: that of which it is possible to give an equivalent reproduction.... The real is not only what can be reproduced, but that which is always already reproduced. The hyperreal.
    Jean Baudrillard (b. 1929)

    Was man made stupid to see his own stupidity?
    Is God by definition indifferent, beyond us all?
    Is the eternal truth man’s fighting soul
    Wherein the Beast ravens in its own avidity?
    Richard Eberhart (b. 1904)

    Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.
    Walter Pater (1839–1894)